捷克佳博客

Jack JIA’s Online Database–不求时效,但求珍藏。一个用于新闻分析研究以及个人文章存档的网络资料库。除署名原创外,所录部分文章仅在于提供多方视角,并不代表博主观点。如认为文章侵权,请电邮至 jackjia(a)gmail.com。
Archive for 一月, 2007

20070131/中医百年噩梦(1)

多维记者万毅忠报导/望闻问切、号脉观神这一将悬壶郎中与恹恹病患囊括其间的画面,就像一部黑白默片中记录下来的情景,在中国大地上存在了数千年。似乎在旧时的日子里,人们生死无悔,从没有人对这祖宗流传下来的医术说过不字。

但百多年前的鸦片战争不仅打开了国门,随之而来的现代科学也让中医陷入了持续不断的噩梦之中。06年4月,长沙的中南大学教授张功耀发表《告别中医中药》一文,10月6日他又和美国纽约的华人康复医生王澄一起提出《关于促使中医中药逐步退出国家医疗体制的建议》,并征集签名,由此引发了最新一波对中医的挞伐,在海内外中文网站引起了激烈争辩,10月16日,中国卫生部表态反对这样的言论和做法,国内各门户网站也接到论战禁止令,让处于守势的中医获得了片刻的安宁。然而透过这一面由官方赐予的盾牌,人们再一次感觉到了中医在百年噩梦中的悸动。

唯中国有两个医

06年10月,王澄在国际互联网发表了一篇题为《中医和我们,既生瑜何生亮》的文章,毫不掩饰自己对中医疾恶如仇的立场。他在位于纽约法拉盛的一家私人诊所内向多维记者讲述了自己的立场,导致这一立场的既有来自其父的渊源,又基于自身的经历。

王澄的父亲早年就读于渖阳中国医科大学的前身-日本满洲国医科大学,通德文和日文,毕业时满洲已经解放,他父亲投身于新中国的医疗事业,1955年赴新疆支援新成立的新疆医学院,任学院病理科副主任,后被派去学俄文,并自学了英语。王澄认为他的父亲具有开放的胸襟,对人类的知识充满渴求,但后来被派去北京参加针对西医专家的中医培训,却无法接受中医学说,回到乌鲁木齐直对夫人说:中医胡说八道。这是幼时王澄对中医的第一印象。

王澄还告诉多维:“有一次我父亲受令急飞北京,回来后我听到他跟我妈妈说,原来有其他国家领导人听说中医能治癌症,希望中国发扬人道主义精神,帮助治疗一位病人,周总理一听就害怕了,连忙召集专家开会。我爸爸作为专家去了北京,大家开会的结论是中医治癌并非属实。”

在这样的家庭环境中长大,王澄自小对中医就有一双审视的眼睛,后来他个人的经历和学识逐渐使他站在了中医的对立面。

王澄上山下乡时所在的村子里有一个50多岁的老单身汉姓帅,由于双手患有内风湿关节炎,无法干重活,在村里食堂里做管理员。1969年时他存了一千元巨款,考虑是先娶老婆呢还是先治疗双手。考虑再三,他决定先把手治好了,因为有了健康,老婆自然就有了。那时王澄所在的村子里有一位中医,收了老帅的钱之后,郑重其事地说:“你的病为时已久,我必须给你下重药。”就在用药的第二天,老帅暴死,郎中也跑了。老帅的死让王澄至今还很激动:“最让我难受的是,这件事情没人管,人被害死了也没人过问。在农村,你死活都没人管,我发现社会底层原来就是这样。”

76年,王澄已经是新疆医学院工农兵学员中的高年级学生,一次随医疗队下乡,遇到一个四瘫的小伙子被人抬来抢救,他脖子以下都不能动弹了。原来这个小伙子有精神病,一位中医用大针从他的大椎穴插进去,切断了颈椎,送来医疗队抢救,但回天无力,小伙子很快就死了。30年后,王澄向记者比划着那根针的粗细:“我看到了那根大针,有打毛线的针那么粗,可能在脖子里还捻动了。”

王澄告诉多维,直到那个时候,他对中医还没有彻底绝望,他带着更多的问题观察中医,但结果总是让他失望。1977年,王澄毕业后到新疆医学院第一附属医院胸外科工作,听患者说中医不用开刀就能治愈食道癌。他慕名骑着自行车去乌鲁木齐郊区,进入一间空房子里,里面有一个人声称自己治愈了食道癌,并拿出病人留下的医院病历,王澄发现那是他的同事写的病历,上面记载了患者吞咽困难,怀疑有食道肿瘤,但没有确诊。病人之后找到中医,吃了一些药后,吞咽问题消失了,这人就宣称自己能治愈食道癌。王澄告诉多维:“要确诊食道癌,要拍X光,要做活检和病理分析。那时我还天真,骑了很久的自行车去寻找奇迹,结果认真而来,反感而去。”

这一反感而去,使王澄与中医越行越远。后来他在国内完成了西医博士的课程,88年离开工作单位北京安真医院,先后在美国的杜克大学、Emory大学、费城心脏研究所和纽约Maimonides医院做研究,之后在纽约Maimonides医院和哥伦比亚大学长老会医院做住院医生,于哥伦比亚大学长老会医院康复专业毕业后,开设了私人诊所。

他带着对中国的记忆行走在美利坚的土地上,有一天他突然省悟到:“全世界都衹有一种医学,那就是现代医学,衹有中国支持两种医学。要么全世界错了,要么中国错了。”在与多维的访谈中,王澄重申了他这一最引人瞩目的发现。

这一省悟令他自己也大吃一惊,接着他就怀疑,中国的医疗体制可能从1949年开始就出错了。在多年的观察和思考之后,他于2006年1月写了长文《从美国看中国大陆的医疗体系》,由于中国的《健康报》拒绝登载此文,王澄将全文上网并自行印刷成册。王澄在封底写上了自己的墓志铭:“给我机会,让我看让我想,我会和别人说的不一样。”

06年10月,王澄起草了《关于促使中医中药逐步退出国家医疗体制的建议》,一些话语引起激烈震荡。他敦促中国“修改宪法,删除宪法第21条关于中医的内容。”呼吁中国政府“采取适当措施,让中医在5年内全面退出国家医疗体制,回归民间,使科学医学(西医)成为国家唯一的主流医学”,并“立即停止中药研究”。

王澄为中医设想的情景是:和其他国家的传统土医一样,中医存在于民间文化之中,无声地潜伏在街巷村陌,衹要不害人,信者尽可以去看,就如和它历史同样悠久的风水算命,远离国家的医疗体制。王澄引用汉医在日本明治维新后遭受废医存药的命运,认为中国对中医应该更严厉,要废医验药。

像一百多年来挞伐中医的人一样,王澄告诉多维他这次用的也是现代科学这一利器:“中医往下垮的原因是它抗不过现代科学,科学带来进步,电脑和X光连在一起就是CT,后来又产生了核磁共振,数学物理化学生化是现代科学的根,因为这些现代科学是在同一个体系里的,各学科可以相互促进。而脱离现代科学的中医,就像是一个孤儿,在现代人往前看时,他们还往后看,沉溺于祖先留下的稀少的古籍之中。”

《黄帝内经》等中医古籍在王澄看来是没有完成进化的古化石,他曾撰文说:“中医是人类进化到17世纪以前的一块化石,归入中国的正统医学是中国的一个历史性的错误,并导致中医在中国泛滥成灾,中医与当代中国大陆社会进步格格不入。它不属于科学,而属于宗教范畴。”他在06年8月撰文猛烈抨击中国工程院的四名中医师院士,认为“喇嘛道士都会”随着满嘴阴阳五行的人“成为院士”。

王澄在06年11月发表的《疑难杂症-医生水平极其低下的人类群体的黑话》一文中,对中医的绝活-治疗疑难杂症进行了猛烈攻击。他提出美国没有疑难杂症,中国的高级领导人也不会得疑难杂症,疑难杂症衹是水平低下的中医的哄人之说。王澄举毛泽东为例:1974年,毛得了一种病,吞咽无力流口水,两手两腿无力,手掌的肌肉和小腿的肌肉明显萎缩,被中国最顶尖的西医诊断为极为罕见的运动神经元性肌肉萎缩病ALS,最多能活两年,毛泽东果然于1976年9月逝世。王澄认为:“如果没有西医,毛泽东也会被中医说成死于疑难杂症。”

剧烈的现代风扫荡着古老的中国,有的地方焕然一新,有的地方沦为死角,王澄认定那被遗忘的死角,就是中医。他相信自己参与发起的2006年中医争辩硬是活生生地把中医这块黑洞洞的天划了一个大口子,让阳光洒了进来。他告诉多维:“我们的观点和做法,会借着中国的现代风张扬出去,多年之后,你会看到我们的观点深入人心。”

为了减弱中医的香火,王澄在06年8月向国内中医学院的学生们发出了《王澄医生写给中医学院和中医药大学青年学生的一封信》,信中呼吁“把学习内容转换成100%的西医内容,先把自己训练成一个100%合格的西医。”他提醒中国的年轻人“中医在中国大陆将被赶出主流医学的事是早晚的事,你们千万不要做了中医的殉葬品,千万不要上你们骗子中医老师的当。你们每天咏经的时候,自己都不知道是在考古还是在学艺。”令王澄意外兴奋的是,这么一封颠覆性的信件竟然登载在国内的新华网上。

06年很长的一段时间里,王澄处于一种亢奋之中,他告诉多维:“我们的论点发表以后,中医界自己炸了锅,西医在旁边看热闹。”被国内媒体称为“体制内培养出来的挑事者”的王澄,现在每天忙碌于自己位于纽约市皇后区的三家博爱复健医疗中心,他在接受多维访问时,坦陈自己作为华裔美国西医对中国医疗事业的关注:“我从小在中国受正统教育,天下兴亡匹夫有责,我考虑的是中国的国家医疗体制,不针对任何具体的中医医生。”

20070131/20%人听MP3后耳鸣:严重者可致永久失聪

苹果日报报导/高音量的MP3音乐灌进耳朵,振奋了心神,却折磨了耳蜗。有调查发现,20%受访者听MP3后有不同程度的耳鸣,有些更把音量调至109分贝,相等於任由飞机引擎声轰炸耳膜。有听力学家警告,耳鸣是听觉受损的警号,若MP3机的音量长期过大,听力会提早退化,甚至永久失聪。 记者:白琳

聋人福利促进会及游乐场协会访问1,025名年龄介乎12至24岁的青少年,有230人称听MP3后曾耳鸣,当中逾30人认为耳鸣达严重程度。香港大学听力学家区建国为曾有耳鸣的50多名受访者检查听歌时调校的音量,发现有人习惯调至109分贝,等同站在飞机引擎外100米所感受的巨响。

毛细胞受损不能复原

听力受损危机以声浪分贝与时限计算,若人体每日待在90分贝的环境下超过8小时,听力可能长期受损;每加5分贝,时限就减半。区建国举例称,若环境属110分贝,每日听超过逾半小时已可损害听力,「你由尖沙嘴搭车开始听歌,去到旺角可能已经超时,唔可以再听落去。」

听觉受损可分为创伤性、暂时性及永久性,前两者分别涉及遇上大爆炸或在的士高狂欢一夜的个案,后者则常见於建筑工人,或上述大声听MP3的青少年。区建国指出,耳鸣是听觉受损的先兆,「好似发烧?,提醒你身体有事。」耳鸣源於听觉毛细胞出现退化等问题,这些细胞负责把声音转化至听觉神经讯号,一旦受损就不能复原。但一般需待10多年后,问题才会浮现。一般人的听觉神经在50多岁才逐渐退化,上述人士的听力有可能早於30岁已开始衰退。

耳鸣加头晕立即求医

香港大学耳鼻喉科授袁宝荣指出,一般MP3机的100%音量相等於打桩声响,「即系?耳仔入面打桩,每日听半个钟已经唔掂档。」若这些青少年习惯马拉松式听MP3,听觉受损风险相等於长期在噪音环境工作但没戴保护耳塞的人士,「?到40至50岁就要戴辅助耳机,50至60岁多数会聋。」

不过,袁宝荣强调正常人也会有耳鸣,但若同时感到头晕、耳朵疼痛,或耳鸣强烈至影响日常生活,例如经常听不清别人说话,应立即求医检查听力。

每日不可听逾8小时

要同时享受音乐和爱惜耳朵,香港大学听力学家区建国建议,听MP3时可将音量调校至50%。此音量相等於80至90分贝,即一般茶楼环境的声浪,但每日也不可听逾8小时,否则长远也可能构成听力受损。

50%音量为上限

区建国又指出,一般人习惯乘车时调高MP3音量,此做法极为危险,应坚守50%音量上限,「地铁?嘈,会不自觉校大声盖过环境噪音,搭车时唔好听歌就最安全。」如有持续性耳鸣,应及早求医查明原因。

港大耳鼻喉科授袁宝荣则指出,药物或按摩耳朵均不能预防或纾缓因声浪刺激而造成的听力受损,目前医学文献也没有订明耳朵每天应有的休息时间。他建议听音乐者每小时让耳朵「清静」5至10分钟,让耳蜗有喘息机会。

中医师公会会长关之义指出,听音乐致听力衰退属外伤性刺激,「对中医讲系?得救,我都要举手投降!」但长者听力衰退多数与肾气弱有关,可透过食疗预防或纾缓病情,日常可用合桃或栗子煲汤补肾。

20070131/图集:加拿大从大海到大海

21CN旅游/在加拿大旅游局的媒体见面会上,听到用“大海到大海”的格言来描述加拿大,突然觉得这个地大物博,地广人稀,有着寒冷而漫长冬日的国度,一下子变得温柔起来。

为什么叫“加拿大”?

1435年法国探险家卡蒂埃来到一片陌生的土地,问旁边的印第安人这里叫什么名字,酋长以为他问的是自己这个部落村庄,便答“加拿大”,“加拿大”在他们的语言中就是“小村庄”的意思。可卡蒂埃误认为他说的是整个地区,从此这片广袤的土地便被称之为加拿大。

从国旗解读加拿大:

加拿大的国旗自左向右由红、白、红两色组成。红色为垂直长方形,白色为正方形。白色中央绘有一片11个角的红色枫树叶。两块红色表示太平洋和大西洋,白色表示加拿大广阔无垠的国土,红色枫叶表示居住在这片土地上的加拿大人民。

行走加拿大,在任何一个季节,你都可以欣赏到四季常青的原始森林,静谧的河谷,水彩画般美丽的湖泊和河流,瀑布,温泉,还有神奇的史前时代遗留下来的冰川。那些被冰川雕塑过的山崖,现在开满了芬芳的野花。

can01.jpg

can02.jpg

can03.jpg

can04.jpg

can05.jpg

can06.jpg

can07.jpg

can08.jpg

can09.jpg

can10.jpg

can11.jpg

can12.jpg

20070131/新移民学历高 但收入低生活贫困

世界日报编译诸建平报导,加拿大统计局昨天说,自2000年之后,虽然来到加拿大的新移民较十年前的移民学历高、有技术,收入状况却没有多大改善。

统计局在昨天发表的报告中说,在2002年,新移民居住加国的第一年里,低收入比率是在加国出生者的3.5倍;到2004年,这一比例下降至3.2倍,但近五分之一的新移民低收入时间比较长。

所谓低收入,指四口之家的年收入少于2万6800元。

这份题为「新移民长期低收入和低收入动态」报告,调查移民家庭和个人的经济状况,还评估2000年以来移民的经济情况、低收入时间,及自1993年以来接受教育与上技术课给移民经济带来的影响。

报告发现,高学历的新移民和技术移民政策的改变仅对增加他们的收入起很小的作用。

统计局认为,低收入是由于本世纪初资讯科技(IT)业不景气造成的。统计局分析家皮考特(Garnett Picot)说,十几年前,移民制度十分成它a将钗h工程师和IT人员吸引到这里,这一趋势持续到2000年代初期,而这些人可能遭遇经济发展缓慢期。

1993年,为了吸引更多高学历和有技术的移民到加国,联邦政府修改原有的移民选择制度(selection system)。结果是2004年拥有大学学历的新移民比率由1992年的17%上升至45%。但这一变化并没有提高新移民的收入。

事实上,以1990年代的同类调查来说,当时新移民中低收入比率仅约土生土长者的三倍;也就是说,2002和2004年新移民低收入的比率,比1990年代恶化。

统计局的分析师说,从公共政策角度看,最令人忧虑之事是在加拿大感到最举步维艰的人,是那些接受过高等教育和拥有高度工作技能的新移民。

统计局的研究报告说,与透过家庭团聚移民加拿大的人相比,相对来说教育程度更高的技术移民陷于贫穷的可能性更大;在最初数年内陷入长期贫穷的困境。这可能是与家庭团聚类移民相比,技术移民者较少得到已在加拿大站稳脚跟者的帮助。

与其他技术移民相比,那些作为资讯科技专业人士进入公司工作的新移民,更可能发现自己陷于低收入的困境。

温哥华不同文化社区服务协会(Progressive Intercultural Communites Services Society)执行长吉尔(Charon Gill)认为,新移民低收入的主要因素是缺少帮助他们发挥技能的政府服务机构。他说,新移民感到被忽视、被欺骗和被遗忘。

吉尔还指出,新移民希望运用他们所学的知识开始他们的专业,但不久就发现,他们需进一步提高教育水平,如果不这样做,他们始终将从事低收入工作。

新移民仍易成为低收入户

世界日报/尽管近年移民加拿大的新移民教育程度更高、工作技能更优越,可是与 1990 年代初期的移民相比,他们的收入水准变得更低了,这是加拿大统计局昨天公布研究报告得出的结论。
2002 年,在抵达加拿大满一年的新移民中,低收入者比例比土生土长加拿大人高 3.5 倍。到 2004 年时稍有好转,但还是高 3.2 倍。

这项调查报告的作者写道:「这些比例比 1990 年代的同类调查都高,当时新移民中低收入者比例与土生土长相比只略微超过 3倍。」

根据这项研究,整个 1990 年代和 2000 年以来的五年,致力于提升移民教育程度的努力,在他们来到加拿大最初数年内,对提升他们的家庭收入水准几乎没有什么作用。由于存在著庞大的贫困新移民人口,本国穷人的主要成分,不再是从前那些依赖社会福利金度日的单亲母亲。

为了进行这项研究,在将家庭人数因素考虑在内的前提下,研究人员将家庭收入低于全加中位数以下的那一半列为低收入家庭。以 2003年的固定价格来衡量,根据上述界定低收入家庭的方法,对于一个四口之家,家庭年度收入低于 2 万 6800 元的就属于低收入家庭。

这项研究报告显示,在 2000 年抵达加拿大的技术移民中,52% 成为长期低收入者,其中大约有 41% 的人拥有大学学位,高于 1993 年时的 13%。

研究人员认为,目前的高学历、高技能的移民长期因学非所用而陷于贫困现象是广泛的,政府必须从政策层面设法帮助他们摆脱困境,否则无论是对新移民、还是对本国经济都十分有害。

20070131/新移民学历提高收入偏低无改善

明报/加拿大统计局周二发表一份移民调查报告,比对新移民自1993 年以来的经济状况,发现他们的教育程度提高,技术类移民比例增大,但新移民的经济状况没有好转。移民初到加拿大,第一年的经济状况是一个关键,他们头一年处于低收入状态的机会很大,比率高达34%到46%,如果他们能在第1年摆脱低收入的困境,随后几年踏入低入息阶层的机会降至10%。

首年若能摆脱困境 情形改观

此次研究以1家四口为标准,家庭每年收入低于26,800元属于低收入。

加拿大统计局周二公布的报告题为《新移民长期低收入及变化》(Chronic low income and low-income dynamics among recent immigrants),它研究移民家庭与个人的经济状况,评估他们2000年后的收入情况,分析低收入状况持续的长短,以及自1993年来,教育程度更高和技术类移民比例增大,对新移民经济情况的影响。

加拿大统计局分析师皮科(Garnett Picot)说,他们相信,新移民低收入增加不多,其中1个原因阙2000年以来资讯工业低迷。

皮科对加拿大广播公司(CBC)说:“后来的移民系统,成功的将更多工程师和资讯工业技术人员引入本国,这种情况持续至2000年后的几年,而这些人在经济低迷时期陷入困境。”

报告发现,新移民的教育程度提高,政府偏向吸纳更多技术类移民,对新移民的收入水平影响较小。

45%新移民有大学学历

新移民中拥有大学学历的比例,已从1992年的17%,提高至2004年的45%。但这一变化没有带来更高的收入,因为实际上技术移民来到加拿大后,更可能以低收入开始自己的新生活。

从1992年到2000年,新移民居加5年,差不多5人有1人在头4年低入低微,跟土生加拿大人比较,这个比例超过他们的两倍。

在1993年移民加拿大的人,20.5%的人维持5年低收入状态。后来经济好转,新移民的状况较好,在2000年抵加的移民,5年捱穷的人数比例降至16.2%。

20070131/移民与土生国民收入差距增大 更多高学历新移民生活贫困

星报通讯社电/政府最新报告显示,尽管加拿大新移民的教育程度平均较过去更高,但他们面对的经济前景反而及不上10年前。加拿大统计局周二发表的报告指出,2002年的时候,首年移居加国的新移民家庭属于低收入的比率是加国出生国民的3.5倍,虽然到了2004年,有关比率微跌至3.2倍。

该个比率高于1990年代的大约3倍。纵使联邦政府自1993年起改变了移民甄选程序,着重接受更多诸如工程师及资讯科技人员等高技术移民移居加拿大,但收入差距情况却仍然出现。

在该批被界定为“长期低收入”的移民之中,41%于2000年抵达加拿大时拥有大学学位,1993年抵达加拿大的移民则只有13%拥有大学学位。“长期低收入”移民指的是他们移居加国的首5年之中,最少4年在贫穷线下生活。
情况较过往更差

研究报告的共同作者比科特(Garnett Picot)表示:“目前情况较过往更差。以前的情况是,移民抵达加国的最初数年,发展得没有加国出生国民那般好,但他们过了数年后,往往都能追上。现时的问题却是,在过去20年,移民一开始与加国出生国民的差距不断增加,要追上来远较困难。”他表示,1992年高中学历以下的新移民当中有48%是低收入家庭,大学以上学历的就只有33%。不过到2004年的时候,虽然高中学历以下的新移民同样有48%是低收入家庭,但拥有大学以上学历的低收入家庭就上升至40%。代表高学历及专业移民求职时的比例优势已经不可同日而语。

他认为,在2000年科技泡沫爆破期间加国大量吸纳的科技人才移民找不到工作,可能是原因之一。此外,资历认证、语言、加国的整体经济情况,也会影响移民找工作。麦马士达大学(McMaster University)人力资源及劳工管理荣誉退休教授杰恩(Harish Jain)指出,要照顾该批失业或就业不足的新移民,加国经济每年需承担大约50亿元。

新移民多为少数族裔

杰恩表示:“当中存在歧视成分,原因新移民之中大多数属于少数族裔人士。”他认为政府应该考虑提供税务优惠或津贴予雇主,鼓励他们聘用新移民,从而协助打破该个贫困周期。统计局将每年收入少于26,800元的4人家庭界定为“低收入”家庭。有关调查主要检视1992年至2004年期间的移民的税务数据及抵步记录。

报告显示,视乎不同的到达年份,移民属于低收入的机会率介乎34%至46%之间。但若果新移民在抵达加国首年内能够避过纳入低收入组别的话,他们日后堕进低收入组别的机会便会降至10%或以下。

每5名移民之中便有1人在“长期低收入”之列。1993年抵达加国的移民之中,属于“长期低收入”的比率为20.5%,该个比率在2000年抵达的加国新移民之中降至16.2%,那主要由于整体经济环境有所改善所致。于2000年全国有16%的人长期陷于低收入的状况,而包括中国在内的东亚地区移民就有19%。

改善须由资历认证做起

星岛日报温哥华记者陈颖茵报道/对于加拿大统计局最新发表的报告,移民组织都纷纷表示对报告不感意外,认为要改善情况必须由资历认证做起。

温哥华的中侨互助会行政总裁陈志动表示,中侨一直也知道这问题的存在,也有不断推出计划协助具备海外资历与经验的新移民找工作。他认为,新移民找工作困难可以说是完全因为资历迟迟未获认证所致。

他说新移民资历不获认证,令雇主也不知应如何处理这些海外资历与经验。而新移民未能找到理想工作,久而久之也会放弃斗志,存有只想子女好,牺牲也值得的心态。因此,改善资历认证程序确是刻不容缓。

加拿大菲律宾妇女协会(National Alliance of Philippine Women in Canada)行政总裁戴奥森(Cecilia Diocson)表示,社区内的多份研究也曾指出,缺乏一个完善的资历认证机制,是导致一些学历高的专才被困于贫穷线以下中生活的主要原因。

20070131/最新报告显示:新移民学历高收入低

环球华报记者宋娜综合报道/根据加拿大统计局本周二(30日)的报告显示,与十几年前移民来加的人士相比,2000年之后移民加国的新移民虽然拥有较高学歷及技能,但收入状况与早期移民相比却並无提高。

该报告是以家庭和个人为单位所做的统计,主要评估他们自2000年以来的经济状况、收入及教育技能。报告指出,在2002年,新移民的低收入率比在加国出生的人士高出3.5倍;在2004年,该比率略有下降,但也高出3.2倍。该低收入的比率高於九十年代的任何时候。

这份报告的低收入標准是收入低於全加拿大总人口收入中位数的50%。以一家四口的家庭为例,2003年收入低於26,800元则属於低收入行列。

加拿大统计局分析员皮科特(Garnett Picot)表示,“加拿大现行的移民系统十分成功,较以前相比,吸引了大批的工程师及资讯科技人员。但由於整体经济环境不如以前,使2000年左右来加的移民正好赶上这个低迷的经济形势。”在1993年,移民政策略有修改,有大批的技术移民来到加国,资料显示,移民加国拥有大学学歷的移民由1992年的17%上升到2004年的45%;同时,拥有技术资格的人士也由以前的29%上升到51%。

如此多的技术移民拥有高学歷及技术本应不属於低收入的行列,但该报告只有少数人脱离了低收入的行列。

移民第一年最重要

报告还指出,移民来加国后的第一年收入有很大的可能列入低收入的行列,有大约34%至46%的移民属於此类情况。不过,如果新移民在来加后的第一年不属於低收入行业,那么在今后几年也不会有太大可能属於低收入家庭。

九十年代的移民,有大约65%的人在移民后的十年间属於低收入行列,在这些移民当中,有三分之二的人在第一年就属於低收入人士。对於大多数移民来说,移民后的低收入期並不长,大约有34%至41%的移民一年之后就可以脱离低收入的行列;大约三分之一的人士移民三年后脱离了低收入行列,不过,也有移民家庭还有可能再次进入低收入家庭的行列。

五分之一新移民长期低收入

报告称,长期低收入(Chronic low income)的定义为移民后的四至五年间,仍然属於低收入行列。从1992至2000年之间,有將近五分之一(18.5%)的移民在最少四年內仍然属於低收入人群。与在加国出生的人8%的低收入率相比高出2倍多。1993年,有20.5%的移民在五年內属於低收入阶层;在2000年,隨著经济环境的提升,有16.2%没有摆脱低收入的状態。造成该比例略有下降的原因是由於经济环境的提升,而並不是新移民的教育及技能的提高。

技术移民的增加並没有改变低收入的状態,2000年的移民加国的人士中,有52%的低收入人士是技术移民,41%拥有大学学歷,比1993年人数上升13%。


低收入移民年龄分布表

20070131/加拿大统计局专家:新移民二三十年才赶上本地人收入

环球华报记者黄运荣报道/“新移民收入要赶上本地土生人士所需要的时间越来越长了,甚至可能要二、三十年。”参与《新移民低收入调查报告》草拟的加拿大统计局分析员侯丰在接受本报记者电话采访时表示。

“以往的统计显示,1970年代来加的移民,在同等教育水平和同等工作经验的前提下,其收入要赶上本地出生的加拿大,需要花上10年到15年的时间;而到了80/ 90年代,新移民花上15年时间仍然赶不上土生国人。”这位任职统计局商业及劳工市场分析署(Business and Labour Market Analysis Division)的华裔分析员指出,“进入21世纪后,新移民要在收入上追上本地土生人士,需要的时间更长了。”

侯丰表示,根据2003年所作的一份报告显示,新移民要突破低收入的瓶颈,赶上平均水平,起码要20年以上,甚至更加漫长的岁月。

在谈及造成新移民低收入情况日趋严重的成因时,侯丰认为这与2000年至2004年间资讯科技行业的低迷有莫大的关系。他承认加拿大的移民系统曾为本国成功地吸引了不少高科技行业的工程师及技术工人。不过,进入21世纪之后,加拿大资讯行业出现低迷。但移民加国的该类技术人员却没有减少,并且占了技术移民总数的很大比例。结果来加后造成人力市场上严重的供过于求状况,拉低了新移民的整体收入水平。

他举例说,在中国大陆,申请移民加拿大一般需要二至三年的时间。待签证批出时,加拿大的就业市场与申请当年已经发生了很大的变化。所以,不少移民来加后都找不到与自己学识有关的工作。

侯丰透露,这项分析是他与另外两位同事皮科特(Garnett Picot)和库仑伯(Simon Coulombe)在去年五、六月间开始进行的,主要数据是来自联邦税务局的数据及移民在抵埗时填写的资料。他们在全加拿大范围内按照新移民来源地及定居地比例,抽取1992年至2003年间每年抵埗新移民的20%作为对像进行跟踪分析。

20070131/两位中国工程师移民加拿大后的不同命运

多伦多信息港/从中国到加拿大的技术移民,因为在到达加拿大的初期选择了不同的道路,最后前途迥异。一部分人为生活所迫改行从事体力工作,并安于现状;另一部分人不放弃自己的专业和梦想,最后获得成功。《星岛日报》今天报道了两个不同道路的移民案例,相信对不少技术移民来说,有一定借鉴意义。

鍥而不舍 梦想成真

当文陇秀1999年底移居温哥华时,她选择在卑诗水电公司(BC Hydro)附近居住,心中就有个梦想﹕希望有朝一日进入水电公司工作。当时丈夫叫她別做梦,但她坚持,並且在5年后梦想成真,担任该公司高级工程师,干回本行。

现年44岁,来自中国西安的文陇秀表示,移民前做了逾10年电子工程师,担任电力工程控制和保护的工作,负责海外工程,经常到非洲、埃及和马来西亚等地公干。

文陇秀想到自己未做过加拿大的工程,不妨一试,同时也为了女儿日后的教育,一家三口就来到了温哥华。初到时,也是工程师的丈夫告诉她,不要寄望做回本行,但文陇秀不甘心,于是著手求职,並给自己定下两年时间,不成功就回国。

文陇秀每周至少发出3至4份简历,持续6个月都没有回音,后来又向黄页那些有「电子」字眼的公司,逐间致电毛遂自荐。7个月后终于有突破,她在网上找到一家新成立的洋人公司招聘技师,面试后对方更愿意给她工程师的职位,虽然她当时还未取得本省专业工程师资格。她说﹕「那是我来加拿大最快乐的时刻,觉得新生活真的开始了。」

该公司后来获得卑诗水电公司的外判项目,在2001年底外派文陇秀到卑诗水电公司上班参与项目,但那公司在2002年结业,幸好卑诗水电公司继续给她不同项目做,直到2004年有空缺时正式成为全职高级工程师。当时她仍未取得本地工程师牌照呢。入职的同年她就申请了工程师牌照。

文陇秀认为,技术移民毋须立即领牌才可做回本行,最大挑战反而是第一份工作。她说要有永不言弃的精神。她最欣赏加拿大社会鼓励人尽最大努力,不计较成果,「这个確实是能支撑你走过任何困难。」

土木工程师油站当收银员

吴先生2003年从中国上海移民温哥华时,觉得踏出这一步可能为他日后的人生带来更多机会。但移民前任职土木工程师的吴先生,现在却在油站做收银员。他说,抵埠后不久已放弃重操旧业的想法,因为他未能克服英语的障碍,但他並没有气馁,也不想返回中国,他相信终有一日可找到新机会。

吴先生在30岁决定移民,是因为看到兄姊到海外都有好的发展。当时他觉得自己在中国的英语基础很强,又符合技术移民的条件,于是就移居温哥华。他在移民前负责高层建筑物的现场监理工作。但到加拿大之后4至5个月他就放弃了重操旧业的想法,「至少这三五年之內,是不可能考虑的。」他说。

吴先生认为,有多个障碍难以克服,最大的还是英语能力。「这里面有几个鸿沟是不可能跨越的,我觉得语言是每一个人最大的鸿沟。」他认为,有些第一代移民可以跨越这个英语鸿沟,但也有些人「永远跨越不了」。

据他所知,来自中国的土木工程师近80%的人都克服不了英语的鸿沟,他说,要他以英语熟练交流专业上的规矩和术语实在很困难。「我的回归(专业)可能是一条漫漫长路,或者是一条永远不归路。」

吴先生说,除了英语以外,欠缺发展前景也是一个因素。他评估大温地区的高层建筑地盘只有20个,而上海就至少有200个。虽然如此,他並不因此而感到可惜,移民前从兄姊的经历中也知道会遇到磨难,因此觉得自己的心態和一般的技术移民不同。「他们怀著太大的梦想,怀著太多美好的东西过来,然后心中的失落和难过太多。」

吴先生认为,英语是新移民能否发挥所长的关键。「先把自己的语言做好,然后,也许你的聪明才智和你的才能,会在这块土地上有所发展。」

38岁的吴先生目前在一个油站做收银员,虽然薪金只有每小时10元,但他不认为移民的决定是错误的抉择。

他说,这一两年都不会考虑返回中国,因这里的「好山、好水、好风光」使他留下来,目前是隨遇而安,在油站的工作也有助他提升英语能力,希望克服英语的鸿沟,然后再寻找新机会。

20070131/冬天的加勒比游老少咸宜

多维社记者林紫乔报导/加勒比海地区拥有30多个主要岛屿,想要计画出最完美的加勒比假期,并不只是决定好日期,上网找到最便宜的飞机就够了。唯有充分的计画,加勒比海的无限可能才能展现在你面前。加勒比海10佳岛屿指南,将满足游客的不同需求,敎你去了这里究竟该怎么玩!

沙滩迷的Eleuthera

所有人説起心中理想的海滩,不外乎就是柔软的沙子、透明的海水、以及芳香迷人的微风,几乎没有例外。

但世界上仍有几处海滩是特别棒的。www.frommers.com网站选出最好的海滩,分别罗列了各别的特色与优点,包括Seven Mile Beach,它有砂糖般的沙子绵延在海岸线上,附近还有豪华别墅令人无限向往;Grace Bay Beach,浑然天成的大礁石,是潜水者最爱的地点;还有Grenada’s Grand Anse Beach,周围拥有顶级的酒店,全在海滩步行可至的范围之内。

现在要介绍的岛屿,并不在这张名单之中,因此,你将有更大的机会去发现一个属于自己的海滩-Eleuthera。这座岛屿是巴哈马的外岛之一,美国目前有班机可直飞该地,你可以选择先前往佛州,再转机直飞Eleuthera,也可以先去到巴哈马首府Nassau,再搭乘班机或渡轮前往这里。

一旦到了Eleuthera,你将感觉自己拥有整片沙滩。事实上,这座约110英哩长、1英哩宽的岛屿,本身就是一块超大的沙洲。喜欢冲浪的人可以去当地的Surfer’s Beach,喜欢玩帆船的人可以选择Winding Bay,至于小孩或只想晒太阳的人,就一定要去享受Ten Bay Beach的柔软细砂与清凉海水。你还可以搭乘水上计程车到达对边的Harbour Island,那是一个3.5英哩长的沙洲,粉红色的砂子遍满了东部沿岸,近年来不少名人都去过当地度假。

名人最爱的St.-Barthelemy

加勒比海上一座称做St.-Barthelemy的小岛,相当受到有钱人与名人的欢迎,数年来成为他们玩乐的场所,无论是模特、音乐人、或是企业家,都曾聚集在此,在高级旅馆、海滨餐馆、以及原始的海滩上放松自己。这座岛屿的常客包括流行歌手Usher、Paul McCartney、Jon Bon Jovi等人,前名模Kimora Lee Simmons更是每年来到这里,作为家族聚会的据点。

想要加入他们的行列吗?那可能要多准备点钱了。由于当地的住宿旅店需求量很高,间接让价格不断上升,在11月至4月的旺季期间,旅馆普通房间的价格从600元起跳也是常见的情况。

当地还有大量餐馆,都提供美丽的景观,让游客能欣赏港口的日落景色,其中Maya餐厅的晚餐最为出名,另一家位在山丘上的餐馆La Mandala也很受欢迎,该店提供的泰式餐点,深受游客青睐。

该岛的Gustavia港口是最主要的船坞,也是游客观赏船只的最佳景点。除此之外,值得游客参考的选择还包括:Eden Rock Hotel St. Barths,这幢旅店日前才花上2500万重新整修,备有数套个人专属的滨海别墅,绝对是最顶级的度假享受;想要在户外来场派对的人,则不要错过Saline Beach,据说它拥有这座岛上最棒的沙滩。

玩游艇的St. Vincent and the Grenadines

St. Vincent and the Grenadines是加勒比海南端的岛屿,这里平静的海水、微微的和风、以及岛屿间短程的距离,长期以来吸引了许多快艇与帆船运动的爱好者。随着该岛的知名度不断上升,以及行销手法日益灵活,岛上一家知名的公司Barefoot Yacht Charters,去年就组织了400多套游艇行程,仅是2005至2006年间,足足成长了45%。

根据该公司的价目,游艇行程的价格将依船只大小与船只种类而不同。若是一艘47英尺、设有冷气与2名船员、承载6名乘客的游艇来看,7日游的费用大约共为9,660元左右;容纳12名客人、船长126英尺的游艇,7日的费用则是64,000元。

另一家拥有12年历史、位在佛州的旅游公司Footloose Sailing Charters,去年年末在该岛成立了据点以推广当地旅游,为了庆祝分公司新张,游客只要在2月5日之前预定5日游的行程,将享有9折服务。Caribbean Star与LIAT两家航空公司,则提供飞往St. Vincent and the Grenadines的航班。

适合全家的Aruba

想要找一座适合全家人的岛屿绝对是个挑战,因为孩子们可能对中午的的海滩感到厌倦,想要找点别的事情做做;爸爸则想要打一早上的高尔夫球,再去海滩躺个一下午;而妈妈所要的,却是在舒适的酒店中,泡个温泉或做个SPA。此外,转机对于一家人来说,也是困难重重的障碍,还有,若你想与你的另一半安静地享受日落的美景,若当地没有托儿服务,那你绝对不可能办到。

打算举办全家旅游的游客,不妨考虑加勒比海的Aruba岛!从纽约飞往当地只需要5个小时,各大航空公司都有航班飞往Aruba,在一些特殊优惠下,单程机票只要129元,正常的票价范围则在400元左右。

来到这里,父母将发现岛上拥有许多适合孩子的旅店,提供了各式各样年轻人喜欢的活动,比如冲浪、潜水、还有寻宝游戏。许多知名连锁旅馆在当地都看得到,等级从Holiday Inn到Hyatt Regency都有,每家都提供托儿服务,当然,女生们最爱的SPA也不会缺少。

除了漂亮的酒店外,这里还有各种自然奇景能够满足孩子的求知欲,至于成人,则有赌场和夜店可以选择。看到这里还不心动吗?那么再说一件事,美国海关在Aruba机场设有据点,因此持有美国护照的旅客在离境时,不用携家带眷,排在冗长的队伍中。

隐遁者的Marie-Galante

Marie-Galante是瓜德罗普(Guadeloupe)群岛中最大的一个,也是逝去年代的一个标记。19世纪风车与牛车,这些在今日难以看到的景象,当地都还保留完好。瓜德罗普旅游委员会的代表蒐斯(Luigy Ssosse)指出,到了星期天,这里还会有斗牛与斗鸡比赛,“来到这里,就好像回到30年前。”

这座海岛的名字是哥伦布以自己的船只命名而来,1493年,在他第二次新世界航行中,他曾登陆过这里。由于这个岛的形状像个大圆薄饼,因此也被称作la grande galette。今日,制糖工业仍然是当地的主要经济活动,而三次蒸馏的高级兰姆酒也很出名。不过有越来越的游客,听闻了当地白色沙滩和旧世界的魅力,旅游业也因此逐渐发展起来。

20070131/新华社前副社长:我发现了能毁灭世界的秘密军事调动

新华网/编者按:1962年,美苏之间发生轰动世界的古巴导弹危机。这期间,后来任新华社副社长的庞炳庵正在新华社驻哈瓦那分社工作,亲身经历了这场险些引起美苏核大战的危机。近日,他接受了本报记者的专访,回忆了那些曾令全世界为之提心吊胆的日日夜夜。

  肯尼迪发出战争威胁,中国留学生走上前线

  1962年10月22日,古巴首都哈瓦那的生活如常。傍晚7时左右,在与古巴隔海相望的美国,肯尼迪总统突然发表了不同寻常的广播电视讲话。他声称,美国的情报侦察证实,苏联正在古巴部署进攻性的中远程导弹及导弹发射场。美国将对古巴实行“海上隔离”,要求苏联“在联合国观察员监视下迅速拆除和撤退在古巴的一切进攻性武器”。肯尼迪讲话前,美国已进行全面军事动员,组织起25万陆军、1000多架飞机和9万名海军陆战队员和空降兵,随时准备入侵古巴。

  肯尼迪的讲话在古巴立即激起强烈反响。面对新的入侵危险,卡斯特罗迅速向全国发出战斗动员令。第二天一早,我走上街头,看到哈瓦那城到处弥漫着战前的紧张气氛:军人在海滨大道上构筑工事,架设大炮;隆隆的坦克驶上了市区要道;荷枪实弹的民兵列队开向营地;街头到处张贴着“誓死保卫祖国”的标语,就连哈瓦那大学的学生们也都穿上民兵制服去上课,把刚刚收到的武器放在课桌旁……我们从古巴方面得知:27万古巴正规军和15万民兵已被动员起来,载运士兵和物资的军用卡车源源不断地开赴沿海前线。当时,我国在古巴的上百名留学生也被紧急动员起来,走上了前线。

  针对肯尼迪的讲话,苏联在23日发表措词强硬的声明。赫鲁晓夫下达紧急动员令,部署在国内外的所有苏军核部队和常规部队进入“战备”状态。华沙条约组织联合武装部队总司令格列奇科元帅也发布了战斗动员令。此时,一支由22艘苏联船只组成的庞大船队,正装载着中远程导弹和相关设备在加勒比海上驶向古巴,其中 “加加林”号和“科米莱斯”号距美国海军的“警戒线”只有几海里了。一场因导弹问题而引起的危机已处在“一触即发”的危险状态。

  苏联秘密部署导弹,中国记者发现哈瓦那异常现象

  其实,古巴导弹危机的爆发并不是一次突发事件。上世纪60年代初,美苏两国在全球范围内展开了激烈的争夺。苏联领导人赫鲁晓夫认为,如果将核导弹和战略轰炸机运到距美国只有90海里的古巴岛上,苏联就能大大提高同美国争霸的筹码。1962年上半年,当古巴领导人切·格瓦拉访苏时,赫鲁晓夫借机提出了在古巴部署导弹的要求。不久,古巴副总理劳尔·卡斯特罗访苏时,双方就此达成了军事协定。赫鲁晓夫当时还信誓旦旦地保证,如果被美国发现的话,苏联准备承担最终的后果。

  1962年7月起,苏联开始秘密实施这一计划,打算在古巴部署4万多军队、72枚中远程导弹和42个导弹发射架。这一行动虽然是在秘密状态下进行的,但是,大批的士兵和物资运到古巴是藏不住的。就连我们这些并不知情的外国记者也能发现哈瓦那大街上出现的不少异常现象。在那段时间,我几乎每天都能看到,有几辆军用卡车将一批批身着便装的苏联青年送到旧国会大厦广场。这些苏联人下车后,便三三两两地结伴到城里游玩,直到傍晚再乘坐卡车离去。我听一些外国记者说,那些天,哈瓦那海港非常繁忙,每天晚上都能看到一辆辆重型卡车载着一些庞然大物驶离港区,车上用防雨帆布盖得严严实实。这些反常的情况很快也被美国中央情报局所获悉。1962年8月至10月,美军U-2侦察机证实了苏联正在古巴建造导弹基地。面对这种情况,美国政府急得像热锅上的蚂蚁,频频召集国家安全会议密谋对策。经过一番激烈争论,决定暂不对古巴发动先发制人的军事打击,而是实行全面的军事封锁。

  10月24日上午,美国正式实施军事封锁,大约有200艘美国军舰驶进加勒比海海域,B-52轰炸机在空中昼夜巡逻。美方宣称,将在禁区内检查、阻止甚至在必要时损坏(而不是击沉)所有可能载运导弹或者核弹、轰炸机以及相关设备的船只。此时的古巴,电闪雷鸣,风雨大作。几家大报当天的头版新闻均是“封锁,我们顶住它!直接入侵,我们打退它!”“反击侵略,我们必胜!”。

  苏货船碰壁美军拦截线,赫鲁晓夫与肯尼迪频传密信

  为避免局势进一步恶化,国际社会开始紧急斡旋。联合国代理秘书长吴丹致信美、苏、古三方,呼吁停止可能使局势恶化的行动。就在此时,情况出现了变化。24 日,赫鲁晓夫提出“举行最高级会议”讨论解决危机的办法。接着,驶向古巴的20多艘苏联船只陆续在拦截线外抛锚停下或者掉头返回。当天下午,赫鲁晓夫又在莫斯科会见美国企业家威廉·诺克斯,私下承认在古巴确有苏联导弹,不过强调这些导弹是防御性的。但是,美国的态度却是不依不饶。肯尼迪在25日强调,苏联必须撤除在古巴的进攻性武器。他还下令国务院准备一份“入侵后在古巴实行文官政治的紧急计划”。美国司法部长罗伯特·肯尼迪也在会见苏联大使多勃雷宁时发出威胁:“总统至多只能再克制两天了。”

  26日那天,哈瓦那城风雨交加。卡斯特罗总理一早就冒着暴风雨亲自赶到苏联大使馆,向苏联大使阿历谢耶夫口述了一封急信给赫鲁晓夫。阿历谢耶夫曾是俄罗斯新闻社驻古巴记者,他高高的个子、皮肤白皙,满头金发,我们私下称他“黄毛”。三个月前,他突然被任命为苏联驻古巴大使。卡斯特罗说,根据古巴的情报和形势分析,美国入侵已迫在眉睫,古巴人民将英勇地抗击入侵者。他强调,“苏联永远不应当允许帝国主义者把第一次核打击强加于她的情况出现”,建议“实行最正当的自卫”。

  然而,此刻的赫鲁晓夫已经开始退却,他请吴丹通报肯尼迪,苏联政府“已经命令驶向古巴的苏联船只不进入拦截区”。26日晚,肯尼迪又收到赫鲁晓夫一封私函。赫鲁晓夫在信中公开承认古巴有苏制导弹,保证不再向古巴运送导弹,已在古巴的可以撤除或者销毁。同时,他也要求美国以解除封锁和同意不入侵古巴作为交换条件。赫鲁晓夫的信件措词慌乱而又冗长,最后一页甚至未盖章,并破例由苏联外交部直接送到美国大使馆,可见是匆忙中写就的。

  经过一番考虑后,肯尼迪27日复信赫鲁晓夫,表示愿与苏联达成如下协议:苏联在联合国适当的视察和监督下从古巴撤走进攻性武器,并保证不再把类似武器系统运进古巴;美国马上取消隔离措施,并提供不进攻古巴的保证。美司法部长罗伯特·肯尼迪亲自将此信副本交给苏联大使,并私下表示,美国也希望从土耳其和意大利撤走导弹,相信危机之后会采取行动。不过,如果美国在24小时内不能得到苏方的保证,美将在10月30日采取军事行动。

  赫鲁晓夫收到肯尼迪的复信后,连夜回信表示同意。肯尼迪立即发表声明,称赞赫鲁晓夫的决定“具有政治家风度”。此时的赫鲁晓夫就像一个吹得圆圆的大气球,突然被一根针刺穿了一个洞,而白宫里紧张到极点的气氛也迅速地缓和了下来。

  赫鲁晓夫出卖古巴利益,卡斯特罗提前将声明交给中国

  就在美苏两国密信频传之际,古巴军民几天来一直顶风冒雨,坚守在阵地上。在前线阵地、兵营、港口、工厂、学校和居民点采访时,我看到古巴民众斗志昂扬,居民们踊跃献血和组织“支前队”,退休老工人回到车间替代上前线的青年坚持生产,艺术家们争着赶赴前线为战士演出。10月28日下午,我们从国外电台那里收听到肯尼迪对赫鲁晓夫复信所发表的声明。不一会儿,古巴政府的一位老朋友来到我们驻地,他告诉我们,赫鲁晓夫做决定前未与古巴商量,古巴事先也不知道赫鲁晓夫信件的内容。为此,卡斯特罗决定发表一个重要的声明来阐述古巴的立场。他把声明的副本交给了我,并说这个声明还没有公布,但新华社可以发表了。卡斯特罗签署的这个声明对美国提出了五项要求,即停止经济封锁、停止一切颠覆活动、停止海盗攻击、停止美国军机和军舰对古巴领空和领海的入侵、归还被美国占领的关塔那摩海军基地。

  10月30日,联合国代理秘书长吴丹来到哈瓦那。我在机场上看到了这位戴着金丝边眼镜的亚洲人。他率领十多位穿军装的和穿便服的联合国人员走下飞机。吴丹同卡斯特罗举行了两天的会谈。会谈中,吴丹告诉古巴领导人,美国建议由联合国在陆地和空中对古巴进行“视察”。卡斯特罗当即表示,古巴政府并不阻挠撤除导弹,但决不牺牲国家主权原则而接受所谓的“视察”。他问道,苏联已做出撤除导弹的公开保证,联合国也高度评价美国不入侵古巴的公开保证,那么为何要对古巴“视察”而不对美国“视察”呢?吴丹被问得哑口无言。吴丹刚刚离开古巴,卡斯特罗就立即召开新闻发布会,亲自宣读了他同吴丹会谈纪要的全文,再次重申了古巴绝不接受“国际视察”的严正立场。

  两天后,苏联部长会议副主席米高扬一行乘飞机来到古巴,继续同古巴领导人会谈。然而,他在古巴呆了25天,却未能说服古巴领导人接受“国际视察”。当时,哈瓦那流传着这样一句笑话:“米高扬要在风和日丽的哈瓦那度过冬天了。”那段时间,我多次遇见米高扬,觉得他面色苍白,下巴不停地颤抖,显得十分的疲惫。 11月26日,古巴政府再次发表声明,重申反对“国际视察”,并表示“在帝国主义面前我们决不变节。”几个小时之后,我在机场上看到,米高扬一行缓缓走上飞机离开了哈瓦那。

  与古巴这个小国形成鲜明对比的是:一个堂堂的核大国苏联却在公海上接受了美国海军和空军对其船队屈辱性的视察。11月7日,美国宣布苏联已通知美方,载有导弹的船只正驶离古巴。8日至10日,美国军舰对8艘离开古巴的苏联船只进行了“船靠船”的视察。苏联船员还掀开覆盖在导弹上的防雨帆布,让低空盘旋的美国军用直升机拍摄照片。12日,美国防部宣布,已有42枚导弹从古巴装船运回苏联。20日,赫鲁晓夫通知肯尼迪,在古巴的伊尔-28型轰炸机将在30天内撤走。当天,肯尼迪也宣布取消海上封锁。1963年1月3日,美苏两国签署了给吴丹的信件,要求安理会不再讨论导弹危机问题。至此,沸沸扬扬的古巴导弹危机终于平静了下来。 (庞炳庵口述 吴志华整理)

20070130/高学历低收入,加拿大式贫穷的新注解

(星星生活记者捷克佳报导)加拿大联邦统计局的周二公布的一份研究报告显示,尽管新移民所受的教育程度比较高,但其收入状况比九十年代还要糟糕。也就是说,新移民的高学历并不意味着高收入。

依据统计局的研究报告,在2002年,新移民在抵埠满一年的低收入比例比土生土长的加拿大人高出3.5倍。两年之后的2004年,这个比率略有回落,为3.2倍。

报告说,这些数字比上世纪九十年代的任何年份都要高。在那个年代,新移民的低收入率大致为本土加拿大人的3倍。

统计局的分析师说,最为担心的是,从公共政策角度看,那些最难于安居乐业的人士是具有高学历、高技能的移民。

统计局说,现在加拿大所面临的贫穷已经不再是单身母亲领取社会福利地问题。在九十年代,具有良好教育和技能的技术移民已经转换为持续贫穷的主体。如果要解决持续贫困的问题,必须要了解构成这一群体的主体成分。

撰写该项研究报告的是联邦统计局的分析师加尼特-皮寇(Garnett Picot)、侯峰(Feng Hou)和西蒙-库仑比(Simon Coulombe)。报告的题目是《近年移民群体持续低收入及低收入的动态研究》(Chronic low income and low-income dynamics among recent immigrants)。

在该项研究中,低收入被定义为家庭收入占总人口收入的50%以下,数值随家庭人口调整。对于一个四口之家,与2003年币值相比,低收入的界限是26,800元。

持续低收入生活的移民是指那些在移居之后的前五年内至少有四年是在加拿大居住并且收入低微的人。

“事实上,技术移民比家庭团聚类移民在移民加拿大后更容易进入低收入阶层,在抵埠的第一年便处在延续许久的低收入水平。”报告指出,这应该是家庭类移民依亲者容易获得已经安居乐业的亲属的帮助。

统计局说,“接受移民的国家,如加拿大,依赖移民的技能和主动性去提升经济的增长。移民又反过来通过这个国家提供的良机去施展技能和才干并获得收益。”

“在2000年抵埠的技术移民中,有52%的处于持续低收入的水平,其中41%具有大学学历,比1993年的统计数据高出13%。”研究学者说,无论何种原因,与家庭类移民相比,技术移民相对低下的状况自九十年代以来已经明显恶化。

这项研究发现,那些进入IT公司的专业人员与其他技术移民相比,更容易被困在低收入阶层。学者认为,这主要是由于移民人数的持续增长高技术领域在2000年后的不景气所致。

报告说,近年来,IT和工程类的技术移民比例远超过九十年代的申请者。其原因是1993年联邦移民部修例,意在吸引更多高学历的申请者,并归入技术移民类。结果是年龄在15岁及以上具有大学学历的新移民比例从1992年的17%提高至2004年的45%。此外,具有数量技术技能的新移民比例亦由29%上升到51%。此外,由于高学历移民人数的增加,与九十年代早期的高中学历相比,拥有大学教育背景的新移民的少许优势2000年后已基本消失。

不过,研究报告说,这个变化并没有转换为收入的增加。实际上,技术移民在加拿大的新生活更有可能是从低收入开始。

统计局报告指出,时机的选择对于摆脱低收入十分重要。根据移民抵达加拿大的时间不同,他们成为低收入户的机率在34%至46%之间。新移民若在抵加的第一年内就找到专长的工作,那么他们以后沦为低收入户的机率会降至10%以下。统计局报告也指出,即使新移民在抵加后的第一年内成为低收入户,但仍有34%至41%的这类人士在一年后脱离苦海,同时,约有三分之一的新移民在三年后仍停留在低收入的阶层。

20070130/避寒绝佳去处:加勒比海10种玩法(1)

多维社记者林紫乔报导/加勒比海地区拥有30多个主要岛屿,从绿草如荫、充满原野风情的Dominica,到遍布沙漠地形景观的Curacao,可以说,加勒比能够满足所有游客的需求。

想要来一趟回归自然的爬山经验?或是想待在服务员与客人比例是2比1的五星级旅馆、每天最大的烦恼是今天要选什么样的按摩?还是只想去一个没有电视手机的地方、好好享受精致的晚餐?对加勒比海来说,都没有问题。

不过想要计画出最完美的加勒比假期,并不只是决定好日期,上网找到最便宜的飞机就够了。唯有充分的计画,加勒比海的无限可能才能展现在你面前。

这就是这份指南–加勒比海10大佳岛屿–的用途,它将满足游客的不同需求,无论你想要拥有整星期的高尔夫球活动,还是想要远离尘嚣、去到遥远的岛屿,这份指南能让游客了解到,加勒比海的冬季假期,充满了千变万化的风情。

冒险家的Dominica

位于东加勒比的瓜德罗普岛(Guadeloupe)和马提尼克岛(Martinique)之间的Dominica,是邻近岛屿中最大、最多山的一座,其面积将近290平方英哩,超过一半的部份都被热带森林覆盖住,成为野外冒险的最佳去处。

喜欢野外活动、骑自行车、或骑马的人,在此将有机会探索延绵300英哩的纵谷,穿越瀑布,来道海拔5,000英尺高的山顶。Dominica岛上有三个国家公园,365条河川,还有至少40个潜水地点。

这个海岛上有八座潜在的活火山,每座都至少沉寂1千年以上,不过地热的特点在这岛上仍随处可见,包括硫磺温泉,以及总有热气泡往上升的沸腾湖泊,这都显示了当地充满着火山运动。


想要计画出最完美的加勒比假期,并不只是决定好日期,上网找到最便宜的飞机就够了。唯有充分的计画,加勒比海的无限可能才能展现在你面前。

当然,这里不会是做日光浴的好地方,因为当地的沙滩上覆满了岩石与黑砂,不过若你打算享受泡温泉的乐趣,千万不要错过Dominica岛。

老饕最爱的Anguilla

多年来,不少世界知名的厨师都来到了Anguilla,在最高档的酒店旅馆中担任主厨,成为这座以美食岛屿的料理掌管人。不过最近几年,本地厨师经过专业的训练,也开起自己的餐馆来,为传统佳肴增添了新的风味。

在这些料理大师中,最出名的就是卡地(Dale Carty),他原本是Malliouhana的主厨,1999年自己开了一家高档餐馆Tasty’s。卡地最擅长的Anguilla料理是祖母炖鸡和磨菇蒸鱼,他说,来自大地的食物是最好的配料,比如蕃薯、甜马铃薯,以及南瓜都很不错。

2004年,Angui1llian本地人史密斯(Gwendolyn Smith)担任KoalKeel餐厅执行主厨,这家餐厅是由18世纪的建筑修建而成,相当别具风味。史密斯的烹调技艺大多来自Angui1llian本岛,但她同时还擅长义大利面料理,她所拿手的菜色包括海岛特色的豌豆浓汤,还有用200年历史的烤箱慢火调制的岩烤鸡肉,想要大啖这道美味的饕客,请记得于24小时之前预定。

狂欢者的特立尼达和多巴哥

特立尼达和多巴哥是个由两小岛组成的小国家,以加勒比海风情的音乐闻名于世。半个世纪前,当地的打击音乐家发明以钢锅作鼓,敲打出风格独特的节奏,至今游客仍然可以看到许多音乐家在练习这个乐器,特别是冬季嘉年华期间,从圣诞节到隔年二月,岛上都充满了音乐。

当地嘉年华的重要活动包括:一年一度的钢鼓比赛Panorama,预定今年将于2月17日举行;2月18日有国王女王装扮大赛,精心的参赛者其服装可能重达200磅;嘉年华最后两天19日与20日,则是饮酒作乐大会。

到了四月份最后一星期,当地则会举办第三届爵士节,今年预计有艾顿强(Elton John)以及奈特(Gladys Knight)的参与表演。

不过必须警告游客,这两个小岛上的犯罪率不断上升,游客要慎防抢劫发生,官员建议,游客寻找住处时,要确认是否有24小时保安服务,当地政府也针对观光地点加强警力,阻止犯罪事件上演。

高球爱好者的牙买加

长期以来,高尔夫球运动在加勒比地区是相当罕见的,严密的发展规定与新鲜水源的缺发,是形成挑战的主要原因。不过由于特殊品种草皮的应用,高尔夫球场最近出现在几个海岛上。去年11月Anguilla有了第一个高尔夫球场;Barbados则是一座拥有7个高球场的岛屿,上个月才举办了世界高尔夫球锦标赛;多明尼加共和国也同样拥有7做高球场,近日来吸引了不少高求爱好者的注目。

但对许多高球迷来说,他们会选择牙买加岛。当这个地方以雷鬼音乐闻名的同时,它还有着12座高尔夫球场,可以适合各种程度的玩家。当地几乎每座高球场都邻近酒店,玩家可以在一天当中,去到不同的球场,感觉一下不同的场地。

Montego Bay是该岛北方有名的观光城市,当地有三座球场:Half Moon Golf Club、White Witch、以及Cinnamon Hill,互相之间的距离都仅在10分钟车程已内。9洞的费用从10几元到200元都有。

最实惠的多米尼加共和国

多米尼加共和国位在Hispaniola岛上,与海地相比为邻,这个旅费与机票都相对便宜的国家,成为经费有限的旅游者的最佳选择。

JetBlue航空公司目前提供的单程机票,未含税的价格在109元到399元之间,除了这家公司,旅客也还有许多其他的选择。美国航空和大陆航空都有班机前往多明尼加,Delta航空也是一个不错的选择。

多数的旅游服务都集中在当地东部的Punta Cana,套装行程也相当普遍。即日起至2月16日止,业者Club Med Punta Cana提供多明尼加7日游的行程,内容全包的服务从每人1, 400元降价为1, 015元,相当实惠。

另一家公司Apple Vacations也提供7日游的计划,安排旅客住宿在Bavaro Princess All Suites Resort旅馆中,SPA、赌场等服务应有尽有,旅客从美国出发,可以选择途中停留芝加哥、底特律、或巴尔狄摩等大城市,今年3、4月选择参加的客人,每人旅费仅要价1,000元。

20070130/如何投诉医生

How Do You File A Complaint Against A Doctor?
Tuesday January 30, 2007
Botched operations.

Bad treatment.

Medical mistakes that have changed your life or that of a family member, possibly forever.

On CityNews at Six, Merella Fernandez will tell you about a lawsuit launched by several women against a cosmetic surgeon who they allege botched the operations he performed on them.

Until then, here’s a look at how you can file a formal complaint against a doctor you believe hasn’t treated you properly.

The vast majority of physicians are well qualified and err on the side of caution. But occasionally a disagreement between a doctor and a patient will wind up before the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario.

The body governs all medicos in the province, sets standards for their practice and hears and judges complaints against them. How can you get a formal hearing before them is you feel a doctor has done you wrong? Here’s a look:

The complaint itself

They need it in either in writing or on what the College describes as “some other permanent form” like a tape, a film or DVD or CD. You can email them but they won’t respond that way. To preserve absolute confidentiality, all replies are sent by snail mail directly to your home address.

You’ll also be required to waive that confidentiality to let those looking into your case gain access to the necessary medical information from the doctor or other health care professionals that are relevant to your problem.

What happens next?

An investigator contacts you to ask more questions. He or she then lets the doctor know a complaint has been filed. Your physician gets a copy of the gripe and the reasons you filed it.

If things can’t be resolved amicably, the doctor gets the right to respond.

Both of you will then be informed of a hearing date before a complaints committee made up of six doctors and three members of the public. But neither of you will be there - the committee only reviews the documentation.

They can then rule:

a) the physician’s conduct or the care provided was appropriate;

b) remind, counsel or caution the physician in writing if the Committee believes the physician would benefit from some advice or direction as to how to conduct him or herself in the future;

c) require the physician to appear before a panel of the Committee in Toronto to be cautioned and have changes suggested;

d) direct the physician to the Quality Assurance Committee where he or she may be assessed and/or required to participate in educational programs;

e) refer the physician to the College’s Executive Committee if there are concerns about the physician’s health that affect her or his ability to practice;

f) refer the concerns about the physician to the Discipline Committee; or

g) decide not to investigate because the complaint is frivolous, made in bad faith or is an abuse of process.

They’ll tell you what they’ve decided within about two months of their hearing. Unless the process involves moving the complaint up to a higher board and affects the doctor’s ability to practice, you’ll be able to appeal it.

How to file a complaint

There are several ways to contact the College

Phone: (416) 967-2615 or 1-800-268-7096 ext. 615.

E-mail: mailto:investigations&resolutions@cpso.on.ca

Snail Mail:
The Registrar

c/o Investigations and Resolutions Department

The College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario

80 College Street

Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2E2

Fax: (416) 961-3330
c/o Investigations and Resolutions Department

To get a form online click here.
http://www.cpso.on.ca/Info_Public/compform.htm

Source: OCPSO

http://www.citynews.ca/news/news_7352.aspx

20070130/高学历低收入,贫穷的新形象

The new face of poverty
VIRGINIA GALT

Globe and Mail Update

In spite of their higher education levels, new immigrants to Canada are worse off now than they were in the 1990s, Statistics Canada reported Tuesday.

In 2002, low-income rates among immigrants during their first full year in Canada were 3.5 times higher than those of Canadian-born people. By 2004, the rate had eased only slightly, to 3.2 times higher, Statscan reported.

“These rates are higher than at any time during the 1990s, when the low-income rates for immigrants were roughly three times higher than the rate for Canadian-born people.”

The greatest concern from a public policy standpoint is that those who have the most difficulty establishing themselves are highly-educated and highly-skilled immigrants, Statscan analysts said.

Rising educational levels among immigrants throughout the 1990s and the first half of this decade have had little beneficial effect on their family income levels in their early years in Canada, according to the research.

The face of poverty in Canada is no longer that of a single mother on welfare, Statscan said.

“The shift to more educated and skilled class immigrants has changed the face of the chronically poor in the 1990s [and] if one is going to address issues of chronic poverty, it is necessary to know something of the groups that constitute the majority in this class,” wrote Statscan analysts Garnett Picot, Feng Hou and Simon Coulombe.

For the purposes of this study, low income was defined as family income below 50 per cent of median income of the total population, adjusted by family size. The low-income cutoff point was $26,800, in 2003 constant dollars, for a family of four.

Immigrants described as living in chronic low income were those who earned low incomes for at least four of their first five years in Canada.

“Skilled class immigrants were, in fact, more likely than the family class immigrants to enter low income upon entry to Canada, and to find themselves in chronic low income during the first years in this country,” the report said. This could be because family class immigrants find themselves joining relatives who are already established to some extent.

“Host countries, such as Canada, look to the skills and initiative of immigrants to promote economic growth. Immigrants, in turn, look to the host country for opportunities to gainfully employ their skills and abilities,” Statscan said.

“Among those who arrived in 2000, 52 per cent of those in chronic low income were skilled economic immigrants, About 41 per cent had university degrees, up from 13 per cent in the 1993 cohort.”

Those who entered the company as information technology professionals were more likely than other skilled immigrants to find themselves trapped in a low-income rut, the study found.

Whatever the reason, “the relatively inferior situation among the skilled class (as compared to the family class) worsened significantly over the 1990s as their number increased substantially and the high-tech sector slowed down after 2000,” said the researchers.


Globe and Mail Readers Comment

Post a comment Skip to the latest comment

Benjamin Wu from Toronto, writes: In my personal opinion, this is slightly misleading in the following sense. While immigrant labour may be highly skilled to do a job, relative to Canadian born labour, they may not be AS capable. This can come from a variety of barriers such as cultural, language, etc. The argument can apply that as a result, some immigrant labour is therefore relatively less efficient/productive, and thus gets a relatively lower wage (ie. odds are someone with english as a second language will probably not be as effective of a grade school teacher as someone born here).

Now 3.5X poverty rate amongst immigrants is unacceptable and through training and the development of broader jobs (ie. jobs which can take advantage of an immigrant language skills on top of their technical skills and education) we should be able to narrow that gap. That said, I don’t think we will (or that we should expect) to see total equality.

If you compare second generation immigrants, I would expect that rate to be a lot lower thus reflecting the aforementioned barriers that are simply a reality in ANY job market.

Posted 30/01/07 at 12:08 PM EST | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment



Jack Frost from Toronto, Canada writes: I heard (first hand) of a situation where an Indian-born married couple, both highly educated medical professionals, were having diffuculties finding work. They had gone through the qualification procedures that are required in Canada, and both were eligible to get work. The wife got work - her story: she was ‘agreeable’ to the place that hired her. She is a pleasant person who is easy to get along with, and her english is much better than her husband’s. The husband: still looking for work. He can be abrasive, and feels as if he shouldn’t have to look this hard for work….it’s going on five years now, and still waiting for work… The lesson: Try to fit in. Face facts - you are in a different country, with a much different culture. The same behaviours and attitudes that exist in other countries don’t exist here. One of the biggest factors in hiring decisions is a person’s ability to ‘fit in’ with the rest of the team….People always ask the question - ‘can I work for 8 hours a day with this person?’ More importantly, do I WANT to? Also - things are picking up in China and India these days - human rights are right around the corner - the alternative potentially exists to stick with what is familiar and stay in your home country - help to build it by practising your profession in your country of origin.
Posted 30/01/07 at 12:43 PM EST | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment



Guillaume Afleck from Ottawa, Canada writes: A better understanding of Canadian demographics can help illuminate some of the issues that seem to be captured here. When you look at the post-war boom bubble on the chart the fortunes of those born in 1961 and later are completely different than those born from 1946 to 1961. If you had a pulse and a C- average 3-year University degree you got to be a Director general somewhere, if you wanted. For the 1961 and later cohort, even the ’sure things’ including engineering, medicine and so on all turned into contracting sectors just when 61’s were approaching university graduation, and remainaed so for over a decade. (David K Foot explains this line very well in Chapter 1 of Boom, Bust..) So, for those left behind they became adaptive, created jobs, switched professions, and tried new things - but as a group they are often still trying to get to a position that a pre-61er had shortly after college. In short, with the huge surplus of educated and experienced post 61′ers waiting for any promotion to mid and upper ranks there is no leadership position in any organization for which there are not dozens of qualified, capable and impatient post 61′ers ready to compete for the job. The genuine labour shortages in Canada are for entry level (even skilled, like computer scientists, but at the starting wage) and manual labour / agricultural type jobs. And we do not recruit immigrants for those jobs. So an oversupply of educated, experienced Canadians are competing for the same jobs that we let skilled, or at least educated immigrants imagine that they will be getting. And when they don’t get the kind of job they feel they are qualified for? Well they feel pretty much the same as the post-61ers have felt for twenty years, except they are very far away from home.
Posted 30/01/07 at 12:46 PM EST | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment



S L from Burnaby, Canada writes: Ignorance is bliss Proud Canadian from the US…the fact is that unemployment are at all time lows, Canada is faced with an aging population and the birth rates in Canada keep getting lower…the fact is, is that Canada will have to rely on immigration to sustain its output/economy as they will form the essential tax base in which pays for the social programs Canada has in place (especially when baby boomers retire and start to strain health care and CPP). We need to introduce ways that these people can aclimatize to our nation so that they can begin contributing to our society ASAP.
Posted 30/01/07 at 12:47 PM EST | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment



Irie Moonstone from Mystic Springs, Jamaica writes: Be happy with what your new country has to offer.
Be realistic too.
I think a lot of immigrants go to Canada without a clue about anything.
I know an arrogant Brit from Devon who lives in Canada who is not highly educated but expected to get the same sort of job he had in England.
In Canada there’s a lot more intelligent people applying for the jobs he was after.
Net result: An unhappy immigrant that whines and complains all the time about his low paying job.
Posted 30/01/07 at 12:52 PM EST | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment



Dark Angel from The West, Canada writes: How easy do you think it was for German and Italian immigrants to this country in the 50’s? A decade before they had been the enemy in WW II. They were not readily accepted but they learned the language, they worked hard and they assimilated while keeping their own traditions. Every wave of immigrants has struggled so what’s new? I’m a Canadian and I’ve lived abroad, and I wasn’t expecting home in the countries I lived in. So when in Rome you know the rest! The ability to communicate is foremost no matter what your skills are.
Posted 30/01/07 at 12:55 PM EST | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment



Jim Whitney from Kearney ON, Canada writes: Proud Canadian from the United States: Canada must increase its need for immigrants because the uneducated, like yourself, refuse to do the menial labour anymore.
Posted 30/01/07 at 1:02 PM EST | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment



Robert Boyd from Windsor, Canada writes: Too often potential immigrants are told that ‘Canada needs your Skills’.
They are not told that it’s the Provinces that decide if your qualifications are equivalent to the (guffaw) high standards that exist in, say, Ontario.
Qualifications are assessed by the very groups who have a vested interest in not allowing you to work.E.G Doctors/Teacher organizations or
Community Colleges which are only interested in the income generated from ‘upgrading’ skills.
Posted 30/01/07 at 1:07 PM EST | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment



Franklin williams from Trinidad and Tobago writes: The statistics are not surprising. If the government continues to allow the professional bodies to block non-canadian qualified professionals from practising their trade such as engineers, doctors, dentists etc. then Canadians can look forward to asking engineer and doctor taxi drivers for free professional advice!

Canada can use the very same immigrants in the expansion of its infrastructure and all the other things needed in a growing economy and population. Incompetent government and ill conceived spending expeditions in Afghanistan et al only serve to heighten the demand for more and more and more taxes.

The insatiable appetite for taxes is what is pauperising not only immigrants, but all Canadians.
Posted 30/01/07 at 1:07 PM EST | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment



Anthony B. from Sydney, NS, Canada writes: Why is this a surprise? No new immigrant to any country is going to ‘hit the ground running.’ Differences in culture, business practices, language and communication skills, and attitude all contribute to initial difficulties in getting established.
Posted 30/01/07 at 1:08 PM EST | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment



Jed McGarry from Calgary, Canada writes: It’s a little more complicated than simply saying ‘get used to your new country’. A lot of people come here as medical professionals/engineers, etc. and find they have to drive taxis to make a living because their degrees are not recognized. I think a lot of people here don’t quite understand what that means.

Most immigrants come here with open minds wanting to belong and try to do so as best as they can. Don’t treat them like they’re outsiders because that only leads to alienation.
Posted 30/01/07 at 1:09 PM EST | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment



Quentin Brayley-Berger from Toronto, Canada writes: A University degree is not a guaranteed ticket for a job/career/ etc. This is a concept that 60% of my graduating class didn’t understand, and are still unemployed.

The only difference, is that they can’t blame this problem on Canada’s unwillingness to bring the silver spoon to the mouths of immigrants.
Posted 30/01/07 at 1:09 PM EST | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment



R B from Newmarket, Canada writes: I think that the employment situation with skilled immigrants is worth note. But, I caution the use of an overly humanitarian appeal and useless statastics to make the point. Statistics are not accurate and are based on formulaes employing certain assumptions. They acan be (and usually are) faulted and misleading at best. The reality is that there is a problem, but to say that many live below poverty is over stretching the case. For example, the poverty argument assumes that the person has set monthly expenses of XX amount, lives as a single person/family and has no family support from relatives in the parent country. I personally know of two families where the parents have not been able to find suitable employment for their academic background. In one case, the family lives in a modest house but both individuals drive mercedes - while on supplemental income! They are given money from their parents in the middle east in order to sustain a standard of living here in Canada. The article would argue that [based on Canadian reported income] these people live in poverty - clearly not the case. They would also be lighted if they were to know that they were considered as poverty cases. In the second instance, a several families live together in a common house ans share expenses. These people would also be considered to live in poverty since the statistics don’t factor in these circumstances. The fact of the matter is that our statistics don’t measure up and our government and NGO’s need to be realistic when presenting these issues to the public. Unfortuantely for every true instance of poverty that exists there are 3 or 4 statistical cases that are not true. Our government would do well to reconsider the best way to deal with the immigrants who abuse the current system so that the ones that actually need the help can get it.
Posted 30/01/07 at 1:09 PM EST | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment



Yvonne Wackernagel from Woodville, Canada writes: Proud Canadian from the United States, your English grammar is terrible! And, as an immigrant myself, I can tell you that the Immigration Officers should, first of all, learn how to be respectful to those coming in to Canada because, in most instances, their English is better than the Canadian educated citizen! On top of that, their discourtesy and arrogance leave a lot to be desired. My husband and I paid our own fares to come to Canada as immigrants and were received with such discourtesy that the first things I did was to put the Officer in his place and threaten to make an official complaint to the Department before paying my fare back to Britain! Well, needless to say, he climbed down from his high horse and eventually apologised. We have made it big time from our own resources, but not without experiencing great prejudice all along the way to our success. In my opinion, most of the immigrants I meet are better educated -even in English grammar - than most Canadian born citizens, even teachers! They do not learn the difference between a preposition and an adverb, how to use personal pronouns, the subjunctive mood, etc.. If you ask a lot of Canadian professionals who have the opportunity to travel to foreign lands for international seminars and conferences, they will tell you what a shock they get on returning to Canada, especially if they come through North America after experiencing the courtesy and respect they received in such foreign lands which, of course, they took at first as ‘gratitude for their visit’ instead of just ‘gracious welcoming of a stranger’. I have been a proud Canadian for 47 years and my sons have been trained to speak grammatical English and to be respectful and courteous to ALL HUMANITY. .
Posted 30/01/07 at 1:10 PM EST | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment



T G from Canada writes: I think people are missing the real point behind these numbers.
Most new immigrants cannot attain the same professional or social status as in their country of origin, due to the fact that most of their qualifications do not meet strict canadian standards.

In medicine, which I am most familiar with, the vast majority of ‘qualified candidates’ are painfully out of practice or are not up to date in regards to the standard of practice and system of ethics our health care principles dictate.

Most are qualified to go back to school or take licensing exams to meet qualifications-which is exactly what their Canadian born counterparts must do.

The idea that you can become a citizen and instantly be granted full equality in educational standards is not realistic.

I am an immigrant as is my whole family. They sarted from scratch again and became successful after a few years of dedication. I truly believe any new immigrant can acheive the same given time and dedication to their career.
Posted 30/01/07 at 1:15 PM EST | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment



Catherine Wilkie from Canada writes: Well said, Yvonne.
Posted 30/01/07 at 1:21 PM EST | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment



Tim Rutkevich from Toronto, Canada writes: Jim Whitney, you miss one important factor in new immigration: it is very hard for a person who would be satisfied with menial labour to immigrate to Canada. Majority of immigrants are university educated. What Canada needs are low educated unambitious labourers who would work 3 minimum wage jobs and mind their own business. That is how this country have been build on. Unfortunately, now we are seeking ambitious professionals who face way too much red tape. In GTA there is an oversupply of skilled engineers. What it does: keeps wages low. Result: only recent immigrant would take a low paying job. But, a person who paid himself for Canadian university, took student loan, bought a car on payments, then bought a house with monthly mortgage payments; he can not take a job at lower payment without declaring insolvency.
Posted 30/01/07 at 1:21 PM EST | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment



C Morris from Montreal, Canada writes: Canadas social programs are too accessible. The jobs might not be readily available, but the social programs are certainly being utilized to the maximum! Persons who have recently emigrated from their countries to Canada very easily access our medicare system, can probably go on welfare if there isnt a job, and have more assistance from the benevolant societies representing their respective ethnicities, and the multiple charities. Ive travelled and have come to the conclusion Canada has a very high standard of living. Lastly, those people without jobs ought to look in the rural communities where there is a need for their skills…they cant have the best of everything. The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms expresses the fundamental freedoms and that has been abused by people refusing to assimilate into our Canadian culture and yet taking advantage of the services offered. I often thought it would be ideal if healthcare wasnt free and people should live here for a period of time and pay taxes prior to accessing our free services. Complain complain complain! Stats Canada ought to implement a research project of the acquired higher standard of life for the people immigrating from other countries. Blah Blah Blah. As a native canadian, I sometimes feel like IM THE MINORITY! Thank you..All My Relations :)
Posted 30/01/07 at 1:26 PM EST | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment



true maple from Canada writes: Proud Canadian from United States - you are in no position to comment. The US should have closed the door on you.
Posted 30/01/07 at 1:27 PM EST | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment



Tyler Somers from Canada writes: Yvonne — You are my new hero.

R.B. — Statistics are not accurate? Please share with us your understanding of statistical theory — I would love to hear why you think Statistics Canada is a big ol’ waste of time.
Oh, wait — it is much better to use anecdotal evidence from people you know. It is so much easier to confirm your already held beliefs that way.
Posted 30/01/07 at 1:32 PM EST | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment



george moe from Algeria writes: Hey I immigrated to Canada and lived first hand the conditions described, but guess what the grass is greener in the US of A!
Posted 30/01/07 at 1:34 PM EST | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment



Mike G from Toronto, Canada writes: Simply being educated is no golden key to a well paying carreer. There are language and cultural issues with foreign workers. I have worked with a few who I question actually had the credentials they claimed. Communication skills should be emphasized for new immigrants. I’ve met some who after a few years in Canada have a better vocabulary than most Canadians, and others who after 10 years are not even close to fluent.
Posted 30/01/07 at 1:38 PM EST | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment



Dan H from Canada writes: Immigrants, welcome to Canada! You will have human rights and freedom here!!! wait a minute, do you have canadian working experience? no? huh, bye now.
Posted 30/01/07 at 1:40 PM EST | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment



Trent Savinkoff from Canada writes: Good Post Yvonne, however having good or bad grammer does not make anyone a better Canadian.
Posted 30/01/07 at 1:43 PM EST | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment



Colin C from Calgary, Canada writes: As an employer of skilled personnel, the biggest issue I have found with recent immigrants is language and communication. I have had the experience of trying to communicate with language challenged immigrants, only to have them nod as though they understand the issues, but knowing full well that they do not. Highly skilled fields of enterprise take a high degree of understanding to convert those skills into marketable and effective products. Once the basic language barrier is at least alleviated, then the new concepts that must be learned are the next challenge. These too are a challenge to only barely functional communicators. I feel badly for those who indeed have skills that in their native tongue could be highly leveraged, but as an employer, I can’t afford to pay them highly while they play catch up in that arena. I wish that every non-English speaking immigrant who arrives here would put an extremely high priority on upgrading their ability to communicate. Then their skills are far more applicable in their field of experience and they will find employment much more easily.
Posted 30/01/07 at 1:47 PM EST | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment



Xaos Calgarian from Calgary, Canada writes: A difficult situation, but one wonders why an immigrant would choose to come to Canada without securing suitable employment beforehand. Keep in mind that these are not refugees or family-class immigrants. I would certainly not consider going to any other country without first obtaining employment that would provide for myself and my family. To come here with the expectation that their foreign credentials would ensure a good job shows that they simply did not do their research (enough Canadians already have enough problems with their Canadian degrees). I would firmly challenge the false logic behind sustaining a population via immigration anyways. The amount of immigration required to do so would far outstrip our abilities to provide any sort of social support, not to mention the security and cultural concerns. Asides, one only has to look to the Scandanavian countries to see that population growth does not have a positive correlation with economic growth. The secret is efficiency. If population growth was the key element in a strong economy, then how does one explain that those nations with the lowest birth rate are the top economic performers? No rush anyways. Look at the math–death rates vs birth rates immigration–and Canada’s population will not begin to decline until 2015 at least.
Posted 30/01/07 at 1:48 PM EST | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment



Vasili Yeremenko from Canada writes: An American criticizing Canadian immigration quite funny. Canada is miles ahead of the USA in getting skilled people into our nation. The fact is within 5 to ten years Canada will have labor shortage and people will be here to take those jobs. Maybe we shpuld copy the Americans and have illegal uneducated immigrants working at starvation wages.

There are many, many things the USA does better than Canada, I may even say most things, but immigration is not one of them.
Posted 30/01/07 at 1:58 PM EST | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment



J.C. Davies from Canada writes: Imagine you are a professional living overseas who wishes to immigrate to Canada. You submit your application to the local Canadian embassy or consulate and then wait for 2-4 years (even as long as 6 years) for your application to be approved. And in the interim you do the following:

1. Work to improve English or French language skills;

2. Contact regulatory body to ascertain requirements for professional accreditation and licensing requirements (such as College of Physicians);

3. Contact professional organization (such as Ont. Medical Association) that may assist your career in Canada;

4. Contact potential employers;

5. Contact colleagues to inquire as to job climate and opportunities;

or

6. Do nothing but wait .

I think too many immigrants choose option 6, do nothing, and then upon their arrival in Canada expect that they’ll be greeted with open arms and a high paying job.
Posted 30/01/07 at 1:58 PM EST | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment



Cassidy Noca from London, United Kingdom writes: Any person contemplating a decision to emigrate to another country should be well informed about the transferrability of their educational and skill set before taking such a leap. In highly regulated and competitive professions such as Medicine and Law, one would expect some investigation into the barriers to entry prior to making a commitment to a new country. A more streamlined system of recognising foreign credentials would be desirable, especially in professions where there is a need, but immigrants should have realistic expectations. There are no guarantees.
Posted 30/01/07 at 2:03 PM EST | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment



stand up mimi from Vancouver, Canada writes: Yvonne W: So most immigrants you meet are better educated than most Canadians? Maybe that’s because most immigrants have to be highly educated in order to come here. In Canada as a whole, there’s a mix of highly educated and less educated people, as there is in Britain and everywhere else. You have a point about grammar, though. I think email and instant messaging are partly to blame for the lapse in language skills. When writing becomes nearly as immediate as speaking, structure seems to go out the window. As for the subjunctive - I believe there has been a decline in its use in English speaking countries in general, not just in Canada. If only it were not so!
Posted 30/01/07 at 2:10 PM EST | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment



M Kaly from Toronto, Canada writes: I sympathize with the challenges faced by immigrants, educated and highly skilled or not. But I also happen to know dozens of Canadian-born, fluent English speaking people with multiple degrees who are working in unpaid internships or not working at all. I never thought I would say this, but until I and my three roommates (all of us Canadian-born, fluent in English as well as eleven other languages between us, and having at least three university degrees each) are able to earn enough money to rent our own apartments (forget about the dream of owning a home), I won’t have much sympathy.
Posted 30/01/07 at 2:10 PM EST | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment



Mr Fijne from Calgary, Canada writes: Without the US neighbor free market influence, Canada would be among the last Stalinist countries on the face of planet earth. Rampant socialism, bureaucracy, politics of envy turned a national sport and condescendence toward new comers, Canada may very well have been included in Borat’s spoof. Canadians do enjoy showing off their lifestyle to newcomers, tolerate if the new comer reaches a approaching social level but do not forgive him if he does better than them. Canada’s standards are it seems the highest in the world in every domain known to mankind: at that rate, Nobel Prize laureates must be driving cabs… sadly they may if they come from elsewhere… In the past year we have now seen attacks on dual citizens using the Lebanon crisis as a pretext. Canada seems for canadians and that implies born canadians, even if in the end succesful immigrants pay the taxes many of these couch potatoes won’t, in order to preserve their worldclass lifestyle. Skilled immigrants do not look for silver spoons, believe me, they have too much fire inside to make it in a foreign country, speak a foreign language and do better for themselves and naively for the country who welcome them/understand that they will bring their talent to serve their adopted country. Now that new comers have respected their part of the deal, that they have been successful and repaid thousand times Canada for the opportunity, voices are starting to criticize them and envy them. Be careful of what you wish because in the end you may get what you want: unskilled refugies that politicians can bribe with a dishwasher, captive audience that will vote for them and provide cheap labour. But that has never been, is not and never will be my vision of Canada and I surely hope for all that it is not canadians’.
Posted 30/01/07 at 2:15 PM EST | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment



P W from Kelowna, Canada writes: I recruit poeple. I need to recruit more. I would love to hire more immigrant workers BUT there’s a catch. My stakeholders and the collective agreement I have to work under require that we use Canadian education programs as a basis when looking at applicants. This means that new immigrants have to have their education from overseas evaluated by a Cdn university, college or trade school. Many of these immigrants either a) don’t have the paper work to back up their quals, b) when they find out that they would have to write a test or take an additional course, they give up, and/or c)don’t even try to get their quals evaluated.
That said, if they do have quals that are recognized by someone somewhere in Canada, I’ll hire them. Infact I have.
Posted 30/01/07 at 2:25 PM EST | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment



anu bose from ottawa, Canada writes: J.C Davies-immigrants cannot enter Canada without a good knowledge of one of the two languages of the country, they are selected for theri skills, they are told by immigration officials that their qualifications will be accepted at par….no one bothers to tell them that the self-regulatory bodies practice supply management…very few immigrants wait for opportunities to fall into their laps.
Posted 30/01/07 at 2:28 PM EST | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment



polar camel from Toronto, Canada writes: People who decide to immigrate, especially highly educated people, should conduct their own research before coming to Canada. The mighty Internet allows anybody to find all possible pieces of information on any chosen topic. But we keep hearing and reading stories about surprised newcomers who didn’t expect that their credentials and experience would be questioned and/or scrutinized by Canadian bodies. Some of these credentials and experience might be regarded as inadequate or irrelevant in Canadian reality. Well, if one is so educated and sophisticated, one should make an effort to prepare onself BEFORE immigrating to Canada! It’s hard to feel sorry towards those who being educated and considered ’smart’, choose not to invest time and energy in finding out about any prospective barriers and difficulties they might face upon arrival in a new country. On the other hand, we should probably rethink and discuss again the whole immigration policy focused mainly on attracting educated and skilled immigrants. Do we really need these people so badly? Maybe instead of investing millions of dollars in various settlement and language programs for the newcomers, we should be investing the same money in our own students? Think about it - if 5 years ago we would have helped 1000 more students to get into medical schools in Ontario, today we would have had 1000 more doctors - we could have used the same money, which we had spent on helping new immigrants settling down in Ontario. Many of these immigrants will never be doctors, will never work in their professions, may not even learn English well enough. Sure, we need SOME number of immigrants, but it’s time to open discussion on how many and with what kind of education. As it is now, we are misleading the prospective newcomers and kidding ourselves that these waves of immigrants will really solve problems of our demography and economy.
Posted 30/01/07 at 2:28 PM EST | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment



James Lee from Vancouver, Canada writes: The problem is that Canada’s immigration selection process which gives maximum points to a PhD no matter the field of study does not recognize the reality of what jobs are in demand and in short supply. What is in demand are skilled trades and unskilled manual work. I have immigrant clients in the skilled trades and, believe me, they get good jobs very quickly even with poor English skills. On the other hand I meet tons of evereducated taxi drivers in Vancouver every day. I’ve met very educated Chemists and PhD Economists in taxis here.
Posted 30/01/07 at 2:28 PM EST | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment



bruce weaver from Toronto, writes: How about learning proper English or French, and quit worrying about what goes on in Somalia and Palestine. You are in Canada now, worry about schools, taxes, health care, you might be aurprised. You will fit in better and maybe get a better job.
Posted 30/01/07 at 2:32 PM EST | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment



Irie Moonstone from Mystic Springs, Jamaica writes: Yvonne,

You think they speak better English in the UK? Try going back there and see for yourself.

The most popular word I young people saying was AIN’T. How very British of them.

Most Brits are doing eveything they can to get over to Canada, then all they do is whinge like you.

Brits are the most arrogant race on the planet and offer nothing to a new country when all they do is complain.
Posted 30/01/07 at 2:35 PM EST | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment



Rob Bairos from Toronto, Canada writes: ‘For the purposes of this study, low income was defined as family income below 50 per cent of median income of the total population, adjusted by family size.’

Please keep in mind, this definition of low income has nothing to do with
actual standards of living or hardships of poverty.

By statscan standards, in a population of dot-com millionaires, one half would be considered low-income.

Rob
Posted 30/01/07 at 2:36 PM EST | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment



Sue W from Canada writes: ‘….Whatever the reason, “the relatively inferior situation among the skilled class (as compared to the family class) worsened significantly over the 1990s as their number increased substantially and the high-tech sector slowed down after 2000….’

Whatever the reason? It’s called supply and demand.

Exactly how many ‘highly-educated and highly-skilled’ Canadian citizens lost their jobs in the 1990’s in various sectors, and how about in the high-sector industry when it crashed in 2000? And how many more information technology professionals was CIC welcoming into the country when there weren’ enough jobs for the Canadians already living here?
Posted 30/01/07 at 2:43 PM EST | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment



J.C. Davies from Canada writes: ‘J.C Davies-immigrants cannot enter Canada without a good knowledge of one of the two languages of the country, they are selected for theri skills, they are told by immigration officials that their qualifications will be accepted at par….no one bothers to tell them that the self-regulatory bodies practice supply management.’

Having the bare minimum language skills to come to Canada is not going to be sufficient for professional position. As others have pointed out, with the internet it’s easier than ever for immigrants to research Canada’s professional opportunities themselves.
Posted 30/01/07 at 2:43 PM EST | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment



Mr Fijne from Calgary, Canada writes: PW from Kelowna, considering that professional associations from Alberta barely aknowledge degrees from a BC university, this is an open door for discrimination even if one provides the documentation. You may want to know that there have been precedents when companies have succesfully legally challenged these associations in order to have european PhDs recognized on par with Canadian’s. Acquisition of any other typically Canadian skills can surely be completed on the job or as a professional course without requiring the extra burden of University little dictators that often amounts to a disguised way to protect born canadians from the competition of better trained smart new comers…
Posted 30/01/07 at 2:44 PM EST | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment



Joseph T from Victoria, Canada writes: Yvonne: good post. I think being a close neighbor of our American friends, we are starting to pick up some of their arrogance, too.
Posted 30/01/07 at 2:48 PM EST | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment



Sue W from Canada writes: anu bose from ottawa: ‘….immigrants cannot enter Canada without a good knowledge of one of the two languages of the country….’

You can’t possibly be living in Canada.
Posted 30/01/07 at 2:50 PM EST | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment



Renu Misir from Toronto, writes: Would these highly qualified professionals flock to our shores had they been (made) aware of difficulties in finding placements in their respective fields of expertise?

If this is the problem , then it must be addressed–to ensure that Canada is an attractive destination for skilled immigrants!
Posted 30/01/07 at 2:54 PM EST | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment



Youssi M from Canada writes: Canada faces some difficult problems like environment, multiculturalism or the looming healthcare crisis. This issue, on the other hand, can basically be solved by one stroke of pen if we made immigration employment-based, like (kill me now) the US green card system. Parameters like cap on yearly intake, education, language requirements may all be subject to discussion but in principle the onus should be on employers* to seek out suitable workers abroad, not on *embassy bureaucrats socially engineering immigration intake according to some mathematical formula - as that’s what the current system amounts to.
Posted 30/01/07 at 2:56 PM EST | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment



Pretty Much from Toronto, Canada writes: Sue W- There is a difference between immigrants and refugees. Immigrants are skilled and speak one of the two languages and refugees are well refugees.
Posted 30/01/07 at 2:59 PM EST | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment



Tyler Somers from Canada writes: Rob — Well, if the population of Canada were all millionaires then I suppose your point would be worth something.
The next sentence in the paragraph you so selectively quoted from mentions the cutoff for a low income family of four is less than 30K a year. I don’t know about you, but that doesn’t sound like a whole lot.
Posted 30/01/07 at 3:04 PM EST | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment



M Kaly from Toronto, Canada writes: One problem I’ve seen among highly skilled or educated immigrants is a deluded sense of entitlement to a fantastic job upon arrival. A few years ago, I took a terrible temp job essentially sorting through papers in a freezing cold basement. A lot of the temps were new immigrants. They complained bitterly, failing to notice that a third of the temps were, like myself, Canadian-born recent graduates of medical school and law school who had not yet found good jobs but had to do something to pay the bills.

I myself am considering moving to another country, and am trying to save up money because I am operating under the assumption that despite my education and experience here, I will be waiting tables there. At least until I perfect the language and ‘do my time’. I would never be so deluded, entitled and selfish as to assume that the perfect job is going to fall into my lap.
Posted 30/01/07 at 3:06 PM EST | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment



Corey Zimmermann from sudbury, Canada writes: There seems to be a lot of xenophobic comments on this board and thus the only conclusion is that the majority of people posting know little about the history and importance of immigration to this country. While it is true that most immigrants do expect a lot, Canada also demands a lot too. Simply willing to move over here is not enough anymore and as such most new immigrants have adapted and learnt english and have marketable skills: when they come over they are greeted by Canadains who more than likely have immigrant parents or grandparents but complain that they don’t speak english properly. The Government of Canada wants their skills but is unwilling to pressure the various labour organizations to ease its restrictions on hiring anyone unless they have a Canadian degree. But the real kicker is a public that is upset that they use our social programs. Ask yourself if you were a doctor in Vietnam would you come over here to go on welfare, sound realistic, of course not. Most Canadians are unaware that immigration is, has been and will be the key to future economic growth. Ideas and ingenuity are the new kings of industry and having highly skilled people washing dishes or driving cabs is ingorant and well wrong. But what do you expect fro ma society that blasts a single mother with three kids and then blasts immigration, the question is, is where do you think people come from?
Posted 30/01/07 at 3:06 PM EST | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment



Boratsky Bob from Australia writes: So? For making good grmmer is what is making gud Canadian? I will hardly work to make this so. Thank yu Yvone Wacknagell You are nice weclome
Posted 30/01/07 at 3:06 PM EST | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment



Sue W from Canada writes: Pretty Much from Toronto: You need to visit shopping areas and certain malls which cater to certain ethnic groups. Not all immigrants can speak, or even need to speak one of the two languages.
Posted 30/01/07 at 3:06 PM EST | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment



Emma Hawthorne from Canada writes: It is a shame to see skilled people sidelined. Especially in scrappy locations such as Toronto where so many, immigrant and non-immigrant alike are sidelined. We really need a more inclusive and non-back-stabbing society. This isn’t the Titanic. There really are enough lifeboats for everyone. In fact, just imagine who wealthy everyone on earth would be if we could just expand our economies, even with credit, to include the four billion now locked out! However the new immigrant jobsite is an excellent idea. Imagine a place where an employer can find PhDs who are eager to work and probably would sacrifice some wages early on to help new companies get going. It could be ideal for entreprenuers with big dreams and little cash and skilled immigrants who want to make it big!
Posted 30/01/07 at 3:15 PM EST | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment



Martin Chriton from Waterloo, Canada writes: Those that are demanding people with PhDs from third world countries (with most likely worse training than those with PhDs from more reputable N.A. schools) should volunteer to be patients of those doctors.

Personally I’d like to make sure my doctors are 100% as qualified as they think they are.
Posted 30/01/07 at 3:19 PM EST | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment



Pretty Much from Toronto, Canada writes: Sue W- I am talking about the skilled professionals who move here who are actually applying for jobs not the family they bring with them. I am sorry if foreign accents and foreign languages bother you so much.

Also, I need to point out that the Government immigration system is crap. If doctors are required to go through 7 years of training to start practiving here why even allow them to come in. I know a lot of doctors who get fed up and move to the states where the pay is better, the qualification year is about a year or so (which is reasonable) and they are treated much better.

On the other hand, I know an immigrant who trained in AC and refrigeration in his home country and is gainfully employed here since the oppurtunity is unlimited. Why accept immigrants whose skills are saturated in the first place?
Posted 30/01/07 at 3:20 PM EST | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment



Penny Dreadful from Waterloo, Canada writes: My concern is that our immigration policy is holding down wages in jobs that may have had the potential to provide a decent living without a flood of entrants to the market every year. By taking in so many new immigrants, it increases the supply of low wage earners willing to do those jobs, and as a result makes it harder for those doing this work now to get ahead. The people that are not getting ahead? No surprise - they are the next-to most recent immigrants. I think we have to do something temporarily to be fair to those that have joined us already, even if it makes life a little tougher and taxes a little higher for the rest of us. Perhaps not as drastic as a moratorium, but some sort of reduction.
Posted 30/01/07 at 3:21 PM EST | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment



polar camel from Toronto, Canada writes: There is one more issue to ponder: how ethical it is to attract highly educated individuals from poor countries where their skills and knowledge are much more needed and valued than they are in Canada? We allow the good doctors of China or Russia come over to our shores only to be asked by organizations like Doctors Without Borders to sponsor those who will need to help out sick populations of… China, Russia etc. Complete nonsense, isn’t it? Maybe it would be cheaper to help running the clinics in the under-developed countries with a fraction of money we spent on helping newcomers to settle down in Canada; the same newcomers who quickly learn how to complain about their dimplomas not being recognized here, eh?
Posted 30/01/07 at 3:22 PM EST | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment



g c from Toronto, Canada writes: My parents immigrated to Canada more than 20 years ago. Like many immigrants now, they were skilled professionals who ended up with jobs that did not pertain to their skills. Yet, they did not complain. They realized that they were having a much more difficult time here than back home, but staying was a choice they made for their kids. If you ask them now, they do not regret their decisions and their struggles. To the immigrants that are complaining now, if they cannot tolerate life here, they should just return back home. If you choose to stay and you work hard (improve your English, be less critical of your new country), life will get better. If anything, immigrants now have it much easier as racism is much less of a problem today than before.
Posted 30/01/07 at 3:22 PM EST | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment



Michael Tripper from Vancouver, Canada writes: The truth is we have far too much immigration versus jobs in this country.

I was recently restructured out of my position, but I am not an immigrant, so I can’t complain about it and when I go to the EI offices, guess what, all the frontline workers are all immigrants.

You know why? Because no one else will hire them, so looking for work as a Canadian now means following the prescriptions of foreign workers.

And they tell to take any job at all, like being born is the same as immigrating here. Listen I love immigration but not the rampant greedy madness which is informing our policies.

BTW, I taught life and career skills in the DTEs and we focused on ‘fit’ for the at-risk youth clientele - guess what, almost every single employer wants people who fit into their workplace - the values of someone coming from a third-world country are not the same as canadian/american, etc.

Our policies have a total disconnect between reality and political panderers wanting to have a holier-than-thou public image.

Forcing unadapted foreigners on people is madness and can’t work. We have huge homelessness and unemployment, but the government would rather train foreign workers in English than upgrade and train people born in this country who obviously require the assistance.

Why? because immigrants won’t complain about workplace abuse and the steady erosion of rights desperate people bring to the workplace which can only serve what is clearly a corporate state -and I’m calling it, Canada is an estato corporativo.

And when I’m homeless in a month? because I am a short white male (defintely a visible minority) I’ll just be expected to die on the streets, with no one to cry victim for me. My only hope if I get EI, if not, hello death.

Thanks Canada, thanks for letting us all down, native born and suckers..I mean immigrant alike - oh and thanks for using immigrants to keep us all down. Nice.
Posted 30/01/07 at 3:29 PM EST | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment



Tyler Somers from Canada writes: Jim — You make someone else’s point so well for them
Posted 30/01/07 at 3:36 PM EST | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment



Adam Parkin from Canada writes: Newsflash….they arn’t that ‘highly educated’. I wonder if immigrants with Harvard, Yale, Oxford, or Sourbonne have the same difficulty. Unlikely. The truth is you only need to look at the social, medical and economic systems of countries that these people have immigrated from to understand that they are far from ‘highly educted’. Just because you have a piece of paper saying that you are a engineer or doctor in another country doesn’t entitle you to be one in Canada.
Posted 30/01/07 at 3:37 PM EST | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment



S Jung from Regina, Canada writes: This article misses the point. If someone wants to find a job in Canada it’s here for the taking. You might have to move from GTA to find work but if you want it bad enough you will find employmentt. In Western Cdn the economy is on overdrive and finding a job is very easy.
Posted 30/01/07 at 3:47 PM EST | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment



Anthony B. from Sydney, NS, Canada writes: Irie Moonstone from Mystic Springs, Jamaica writes: Brits are the most arrogant race on the planet…’ Wow, that’s a bit of a generalisation, Moonstone. I guess racism goes both ways.
Posted 30/01/07 at 3:49 PM EST | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment



Amil Lindsay from Vancouver, Canada writes: Mike Mike from Calgary’s comment that ‘Many of these highly educated immigrants probably bought their PhDs for about $20 somewhere in Asia or Eastern Europe’ just shows his ignorance. Most of the comments on this board seem to be informed from people’s xenophobia and anecdotal experiences.
Posted 30/01/07 at 3:52 PM EST | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment



Mr Fijne from Calgary, Canada writes: Adam Parkin, they do! As for the highly educated Canadians, how many medicine, chemistry, physics etc… Nobel Prize winner are Canadians? Give us a break would you with your discrimination. Learn this is not sourbone but Sorbonne!
Posted 30/01/07 at 3:56 PM EST | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment



Larry Robinson from white Rock, writes: Right on Robert Boyd. B.C.’s nursing shortage is the highest in Canada. A Scottish RN and midwife does the Canadian upgrade program with top marks. She starts her ward initiation period and is ridden into the ground by her coworkers, written off and told to take the entire course at a local college. The unions obviously have an interest in maintaining a shortage and education is business, they need clients. A container ship captain and harbour trainer moves from Hong Kong to Vancouver. He is amiable, buys a home here, moves his family here. He can find no work even distantly related to his profession. He works one year as a laborer in a machine shop. He returns to Hong Kong, his profession, and makes much more money than would be possible in Canada. His family’s attitude to Canada, they are professionals in positions around the globe, - a lazy, protective, and beaurocratic country that might be a nice place to retire. I am sorry to disturb some Canadians’ perception of our country, but many other nations have moved ahead of us. And not just in the deplorable state of our education, thank you Yvonne W.
Posted 30/01/07 at 3:57 PM EST | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment



Vickky Angstrom from Calgary, Canada writes: Organizations like the Canadian Medical Association, the College of Engineers, etc etc etc would like to keep the price of their services high by excluding these folks. There is no evidence this is racially motivated, but it would be fair to say that they are not making enough effort. Many immigrants come from countries that are (or were) highly developed, like Iraq was before the first invasion. They are excluded. Not fair to them, since they came here in good faith, nor to the people of Canada who will need their services in the future.
Posted 30/01/07 at 3:57 PM EST | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment



Q S from Toronto, Canada writes: You know, just ONCE I would like somebody to point out that this is not a CANADIAN issue. For example, in britain, builders (that means architects, contractors, electricians etc) are used to buidling buildings ‘from the outside in’. This is precisely opposite to how Canadian buidlings are erected. There is a period of adjustment - even for a British contractor relocating to Canada - and that period can take years. In the Middle East and the south Asia, meidcal doctors (esp. in the ME) favour the syringe for delivery of medication. In those countries, when you are ill and your doctor does NOT inject you with something, everyone says to you ‘Get another doctor!’ Can you imagine if such a practitioner were to start injecting people hither, thither and yon in Canada? Last year, the PRINCIPAL of my son’s school tried to convince me to NOT file a complaint about an Iranian teacher who slapped my son across the face in the schoolyard. ‘This is how they duiscipline in her country of origin,’ the principal begged. ‘Please try to understand.’ What I understood was that that Iranian teacher had not adjusted culturally to the practice of her professsion in THIS country. In Canada, NO teacher HITS a child. I complained mightily and loudly. Fact is that many, many professionals need to ADJUST CULTURALLY to Canadian standrads. Canada may be officially ‘multicultural’, but private corporatations, citizens and individuals are not ‘multicultural’ at all. By definition, they cannot be. For these latter folks, ‘the Canadian way’ is the preferred way - from how prescription drugs are introduced into our bodies to how our homes are built. The sooner this is recognized as how things are and NOT the circumstantial result of systemic racism, the sooner we’ll all be able to move on. But this is Canada. No one is EVER permitted to ‘move on’. Thank God for dual citizenship! At least some of us can move out when the time comes.
Posted 30/01/07 at 4:00 PM EST | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment



H Hansen from United States writes: Re: Adam Parkin. Has it ever occured to you that there are probably more students from ‘these countries’ than Canadians enrolled at Harvard, Yale, Oxford or the Sorbonne? The way you throw those out there as indicators of ‘highly educated’ easily shows there are indicators for the contrary.
Posted 30/01/07 at 4:06 PM EST | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment



Irie Moonstone from Mystic Springs, Jamaica writes: Q S from Toronto - Right on brother. If some backwards Iranian woman of a teacher ever slapped my son I would be giving that ‘female dog’ a bit of my right fist and see how she liked it.
Posted 30/01/07 at 4:09 PM EST | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment



J.C. Davies from Canada writes: ‘A container ship captain and harbour trainer moves from Hong Kong to Vancouver. He is amiable, buys a home here, moves his family here. He can find no work even distantly related to his profession.’

Not a lot of container ships operate under Canadian flag. Jobs with BC Ferries are hard to come by, few opening with lots of applicants. Shouldn’t he have checked this out first before moving to Canada?
Posted 30/01/07 at 4:12 PM EST | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment



kwok kwong from toronto, Canada writes: as an immigrant 15 years ago, i am still working at wages about poverty line(i am univesity graduated), but my kids has escaped this curse as they are educated here, talking without accent, graduated from university with master degrees and working in USA at over 80K USD per annum. I would say the first generation of immigrants are to be sacrificed but our second generation will be fine here.
Posted 30/01/07 at 4:12 PM EST | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment



Temporarily anonymous from Canada writes: I must say that this is a big problem that I have witnessed first hand. My partner is from a developing country. She excelled in an excellent professional undergraduate program there. It is generally assumed that these credentials do not have a Canadian equivalent, and are, thus, not recognized, even though I happen to know that the institution and program were both outstanding and her performance exceptional. She has had to go back to school and change her career path, rather than contributing her skills to Canadian society. I also think unintentional and subconscious, but serious and systemic racism is part of the problem, and this is something I wasn’t aware of before. Here is an anecdotal example of how subconscious racial profiling is done. Take a simple outing to Costco. When I go by myself or with my children, I rarely am asked to provide my card as identification. This has happened maybe 5-10% of the time. Generally, they just smile because they see that I have taken my card out of my pocket and hand me my discount page. However, every time I go with my wife (who has black hair and a darker complexion) we are asked to give them our ID. Every time! I wonder how often potential employers subconsciously and unintentionally fail to notice the positive traits in persons of colour in this country, especially those from another country. This might explain more of the difference in achievement of financial success and positions of authority than the need for ‘cultural adjustment’ that earlier posters have referred to.
Posted 30/01/07 at 4:17 PM EST | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment



A M from Concord, Canada writes: It’s all true, things like: some immigrants come here with poor language skills, doctors, engineers andseveral others do not have their profession recognized here, even though in most cases, the time spent in University was longer than it is here, etc. However, most skilled immigrants come to Canada and, once again, are highly skilled, have worked for large corporations and speak more than two languages. It is a whole different story when you start looking for jobs and everywhere you go you are told you have all the qualifications and more but you do not have Canadian experience! Well, if nobody is willing to give anybody a job in their field just because the person does not have ‘Canadian experience’, then, this person will never have such experience! As an immigrant myself, I was fluent in English and when I moved and started to look for jobs here, this was exactly what I was told: I had great qualifications and excellent work experience (exemple: I have worked for General Motors in the Treasury!), I had all knowledge they were looking for BUT did not have Canadian experience. This is where the Companies and the Agencies should stop and realize that, if the person has all the work experience, all the qualification they are looking for, has language skills (able to communicate ‘clearly’ in either English or Language), they should give this person the job. Do not tell me otherwise, because what happens in the labor market is pure discrimination, just because of the ‘location’ where the work experience was acquired. I do agree that the immigrant must be able to communicate in either languages in order to work, because it is really dissapointing to have to talk or work with somebody that has a very poor English/French and does not do anything about it, does not improve it and, is in Canada for years and years! This is what is wrong! Thank God I was able to get a job in my field and am always improving my skills, after all these years!
Posted 30/01/07 at 4:19 PM EST | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment



KY Chen from Canada writes: I came to Canada around 1990 as an “Enterprise Immigrant” with my two young kids. I spent the first two years to try to build my own business, unfortunately the company was closed due to the lost of big money. Then I back to University spent another two years to get a “Computer Science” degree even I have already hold B.S on Chemical Engineering before coming to Canada. Now, I am working in software firm and all my children are well educated and have good jobs as well.
As an immigrant, I have never expected to be treated specially, and I don’t see that this report ever mentioned those new immigrants are complaining the Canadian Government for their difficulties either. Why so many posters here are so unfriendly just because you were born here then you have every right?
Posted 30/01/07 at 4:20 PM EST | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment



Tom Ward from Canada writes: Youssi M is clearly on the right track - employment based immigration would make a lot more sense both for employers and employees. Which is the whole point, really.

A few more thoughts:
1. A lot of immigrants are not presented with an honest idea of what to expect when they apply for immigration. I know this from experience.
2. Immigrants from certain countries are basically forced to burn their bridges when they leave - they can’t go back. Just try imagine no longer being able to go home.
3. When you come to someone else’s house, you abide by their rules. The same goes for immigration - you come to a country, you learn to live by its culture and values.
4. Non-professional labour is where the greatest shortages are, but to argue that Canada has a surplus of doctors is silly. Professional organizations need to undertake to find a fair way to assess immigrants skills rather than simply erecting barriers.
Posted 30/01/07 at 4:20 PM EST | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment



L H from Lima, Peru writes: It??s just sad how most of the comments show no sign of integration. Almost all posts are worded in terms of ‘them’ and ‘us’. I just got the Canadian residence, my English is ok but far from perfect (even when I obtained a Master??s degree at McGill), and have no job in Canada. Should I go to Canada? Is it a good option for me and my family (I have got a wife and a little baby). Who knows. The main reason why I want to emigrate from Peru is its financial instability and criminality. It??s funny how some people judge so easily what immigrants have or not have to do before coming to Canada, withouth thinking of what are the reasons why we decide to migrate. In my case, I don??t want to take advantage (in the bad sense) of social services, like welfare or charities. Relying exclusively on that kind of services would be humiliating to me. I want to get there to get a better life, and in return, pay taxes and help to build a rich society (hopefully). But I don??t want to feel excluded, left out. Will I succeed? I will let you know.
Posted 30/01/07 at 4:20 PM EST | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment



green grass from Canada writes: All I can say is that Canada is very lucky indeed to have people like Yvonne Wackernagel amongst her citizens. I would advise all posters to read her post again, very slowly! Thank you, Yvonne for some very good reading!!
Posted 30/01/07 at 4:22 PM EST | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment



Surfer Dude from Seattle, Washington, United States writes: Come to the US like I did.
I was an immigrant to Canada. Arrived with my parents when I was 3. Went to University courtesy of Canadian Taxpayers. No opportunities for my job in Canada so came to this wonderful country called the US with multiple offers. No opportunities in Canada due to high tax and few employers. Canadians think they live in a wonderful utopian dream world but the reality is a lot different!
Posted 30/01/07 at 4:25 PM EST | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment



Rob Bairos from Toronto, Canada writes: >Tyler Somers from Canada writes: Rob — Well, if the population of Canada were all millionaires then I suppose your point would be worth something.

My point still stands if the population of Canada consisted of tin shacks
and slums.

>The next sentence in the paragraph you so selectively quoted from mentions the cutoff for a low income family of four is less than 30K a year. I don’t know about you, but that doesn’t sound like a whole lot.

Tyler I grew up in an immigrant family of four considered low income.
Two parents working 6 and 7 day weeks at minimum wage for years.
We did without most of the modern conveniences that most low income
families enjoy today. We were far below the median in terms of education,
earning, and language skills.
So in answer to your question, yes to me, that does sound like a whole lot.
Posted 30/01/07 at 4:32 PM EST | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment



D B from Canada writes: In response to Yvonne Wackernagel from Woodville, Canada:

After reading your pedantic rant, one which focuses on criticizing someone’s grammar more than making a valid point, it’s quite clear to see who is on her high horse.

As a doltish school teacher, born, raised, and educated in Canada, my grasp of the English language is just as good as anyone’s. Apparently, stereotypes are only offensive to you when they are made about people who are not Canadian-born.

Thank goodness you immigrated to Canada, otherwise we would have nothing against which to measure arrogance. Please feel free to correct my spelling and grammar, if you don’t agree with me.
Posted 30/01/07 at 4:36 PM EST | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment



Temporarily anonymous from Canada writes: Bill notGates: A racist individual is Bill notGates. Can you imagine how much he would complain if these injustives were perpetrated upon him? Look how he’s wimpering right now, when no one has done anything to him.
Posted 30/01/07 at 4:43 PM EST | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment



Larry Robinson from white Rock, writes: J.C. Davies - My point, poorly described, is that Canada is no longer the first destination for accomplished people. The Captain’s relatives include a president of an Asian oil company and family members in executive positions in the U.S. and Asia. When I asked them, ‘Why not Canada?’ they politely laughed and said they want to make money, not retire. We are now in a global economy and it is in our best interest to encourage trade, discussion and immigration without prejudice from countries around the globe.
Posted 30/01/07 at 4:44 PM EST | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment



J.C. Davies from Canada writes: L H: ‘I want to get there to get a better life, and in return, pay taxes and help to build a rich society (hopefully). But I don????t want to feel excluded, left out. Will I succeed? ‘

Thank you for reminding us what immigration is really about, people building better lives in Canada. Millions of Canadians want you to succeed as well. Good luck!
Posted 30/01/07 at 4:44 PM EST | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment



Another X Canadian from United States writes: Surfer Dude - I concur entirely. Having spent 5 years in Canada trying to build a life there and then moving to the US to suddenly find so much more opportunity, I can only say to any immigrant concerned about his prospects in Canada - don’t believe the lies and propaganda you read in the Cdn media about the US - it is light years ahead of Canada when it comes to giving people a chance to see what they can do. You owe it to yourself to make the most of your life. Most Cdns seem to feel that skilled immigrants come to Canada to use their medical system or some other social safety net - they just can’t understand that people who move to another country are highly motivated and willing to work hard to succeed. Unlike most native Cdns they don’t take anything for granted but only want to be given a chance to see what they can contribute. The US recognizes this and offers them that chance and that is why it is a more dynamic and thriving society than Canada will ever be. By the way, Adam Parkin - I am one ‘these people’ who happens to come from one of the countries you are referring to, but I also happen to have a first class honours degree from a British school and a Master’s Degree from an Ivy League school in the US. You should be ashamed to display your ignorance and prejudice even over the relative anonymity of the Internet.
Posted 30/01/07 at 4:47 PM EST | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment



Black Adder from Toronto, Canada writes: L H from Lima, Peru - Congratulations on your degree. I hope you find Canada welcoming to you and your family.

Please don’t let the posters here colour your judgment of Canada. Many posters here seem to forget that unless they are first-nations, they too are immigrants. Ironically, these same posters will complain about the benefits received by first nations people too. It is simply in their nature to complain.

I have lived in Canada for over 30 years. I have traveled quite extensively and I can say without a doubt that I prefer to live in Canada.

This phase we are going through is a bit troubling. Some people and businesses (and some politicians) have dropped any pretence of civility toward immigrants. I like to prefer, these people are in the minority and perhaps need to get out more, and the phase is temporary.

LH from Lima Peru – welcome to and your family to Canada.
Posted 30/01/07 at 5:00 PM EST | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment



SY SY from Montreal, Canada writes: For some posters here, it seems you still don’t understand that your competition is not from the immigrants here, you think that you kick all immigrants out of Canada then you will have more job security? Please open your eyes, now, it is the global competition. How many North American companies or plants have been closed or outsourcing to India and China? You think that you can speak only English (not even speak a bit of Canadian second language “French”), you think you still can keep your job forever? In your dream!
Posted 30/01/07 at 5:03 PM EST | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment



R. M. from Regina, Canada writes: Having worked with numerous immigrants who are highly educated and had every barrier in the world thrown their way in terms of getting their qualifcations recognized this type of issue deserves much more public debate and exposure. For example, a Masters graduate had to demonstrate he could pass a basic mathematics test before he could take a diploma program in college. It was an insult to his intelligence, his training and to the education system in his country where Physics was studied from Grade 9 on. There has to be a better and quicker way to recognize qualifications. After all when it comes to post-secondary education “expertise” Canada is a baby compared to most of the countries immigrants arrive from.
Posted 30/01/07 at 5:05 PM EST | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment



Patrick Nash from Toronto, Canada writes: Irie Moonstone from Mystic Springs. I’m an arrogant Brit. I’m also from Devon. And a lawyer for that matter. But, I was told to take my legal accreditation off my resume in order to find work when I first arrived in Canada and have not practiced law in the more than a decade that I have been here. You say that “Brits are the most arrogant race on the planet and offer nothing to a new country when all they do is complain.” You’ve just described Brixton in London. Demographic? Predominently Jamaican. You’ve also just described your own postings.
Posted 30/01/07 at 5:09 PM EST | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment



J K from Canada writes: I think the problem is too many people want the white collar jobs and not enough people want the blue collar jobs. There is just too many educated university grads. And one piece of advice – avoid going into information technology.
Posted 30/01/07 at 5:10 PM EST | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment



A Smith from London, Canada writes: It’s delusional for people to believe that language is secondary to the skills that a highly skilled worker has. Consider a lawyer who learns English in Canada. Do you think that they will have problems reading those massive legal documents with all kinds of legal terms? You can’t learn on the job either. In high-tech fields, communicating verbally, to colleagues, to peers, customers and clients, reading documents, attending seminars and meetings isn’t something you can learn in any ESL course.
When it comes to highly skilled jobs, lanaguage isn’t a part of the job or secondary to the skills. It IS the job.
Posted 30/01/07 at 5:14 PM EST | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment



dave srigley from Toronto, Canada writes: Too many immigrants not enough jobs. Immigration should be cut back to 50,000/year, not 250,000!
Posted 30/01/07 at 5:16 PM EST | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment



gargi ganguli from montreal, Canada writes: I was born here but my parents immigrated from India. My Dad had so little money when he first came here that he had to live on apple juice and bread for three months. He worked odd jobs in order to redo his degrees in engineering, and paid to have my Mom redo her degree in Economics. The only thing he got for free was a French course. After a lot of slogging, my parents ended up living in an affluent neighbourhood, and sending me to school in Europe for my Master’s. I’m now a hypereducated vegetarian slacker in my early thirties, picky about my wine, working on a novel in Montreal.

Who’d all you anti-immigrant neocons rather have in the country, my Dad or me???
Posted 30/01/07 at 5:26 PM EST | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment



Chi Guy from Chicago, United States writes: Yvonne Wackernagel, May be you should stop hanging out with the folks down at the trailer park and go talk to some common Canadians. I have met people from all over the world and in my opinion Canadians are some of the most intelligent and articulate that I have had the pleasure of chatting with. I know you’ll slam me for some reason because I&8217;m an American I guess or could be my grammar is not up to snuff for a Brit but that fact alone does not mean that I can&8217;t express my opinion and it should not stop others from doing it either. The fact that you slam Canadians so often just goes to show why you indeed are not Canadian.
Posted 30/01/07 at 5:28 PM EST | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment



J.C. Davies from Canada writes: “I’m now a hypereducated vegetarian slacker in my early thirties, picky about my wine, working on a novel in Montreal”.

Your parents must be proud! (of course neocons are pro-immigration, its the traditional cons who were less enthusiastic about immigration)
Posted 30/01/07 at 5:31 PM EST | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment



Steve *** from United States writes: As an immigrant and as a Canadian graduate, I can say we haven’t even come close to the problem. Educated Canadians and immigrants have the very same problem in finding good jobs. If anyone has ever gone to any job seminars the work “networking” should be familiar to you. Right now what we have is “Sopranos’ connection”. if you are trying to find a good job. Now it doesn’t matter who you are or what kind of education you have. If you don’t have someone close inside you don’t get a good paying job. If you don’t believe me just look around you. It is everywhere and IT IS WRONG
Posted 30/01/07 at 5:31 PM EST | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment



Youssi M from Canada writes: One point that no one made yet:

People write how “third world” degrees do not have much value in Canada, relative to the home countries. There is another dimension to this: there is an educational boom in many developing countries, with too many schools offering degrees of no real value even in the country of origin. Say, if you are an Asian with an Accounting/IT/Biotech degree from one of the better schools there plus you have done some internships, you will get a N.A.-level salary, you may get enquiries from American or European companies. The problem,though, is with provincial schools churning out thousands of graduates whose diplommas are worthless in eyes of employers there. Those degrees are not enough to get job interviews there but are perfectly fine as proof of marketable skill for Immigration Canada.

From some anecdotical evidence I’d guess (can you guys can confirm/deny ?) that majority of skilled immigrants moving to Canada without a job offer hold degrees (and CVs) that would not be competitive in home countries.
Posted 30/01/07 at 5:35 PM EST | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment



darren silverthorn from Canada writes: Maybe we should cut immigration in order to ease the burden they are becoming on our social system, real canadians seem to have quite a hard time getting any kind of assistance, yet immigrants seem to be able to come here and are immediately put on it.
Posted 30/01/07 at 5:38 PM EST | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment



20070130/联邦统计局报告:新移民经济堪忧

Immigrants no better off now, StatsCan reports
Updated Tue. Jan. 30 2007 10:05 AM ET

CTV.ca News Staff

The financial situation of new immigrants showed no improvement after the turn of the millennium although they have more education and skilled qualifications than a decade ago, Statistics Canada reports.

The report examines the economic welfare of immigrant families and individuals and assesses their financial situation since 2000, the extent of so-called “chronic” low income, and the impact of changes in education and skill classes on their economic well-being since 1993.

In 2002, low-income rates among immigrants during their first full year in Canada were 3.5 times higher than those of Canadian-born citizens. Two years later, the low-income rates were 3.2 times higher.

In this study, low income is defined as family income below 50 per cent of median income of the total population, adjusted for family size.

Statistics Canada says the low-income rates were higher than at any time during the 1990s, when they were around three times higher than rates for Canadian-born people.

“The increase in low income was concentrated among immigrants who had just recently entered the country, that is, they had been here only one or two years,” StatsCan says.

“This suggests they had more problems adjusting over the short-term during the years since 2000.”

One likely explanation may have been the slump in the technology sector after 2000, Statistics Canada says.

The proportion of recent immigrants in information technology and engineering occupations rose dramatically over the 1990s.

In 1993, the immigration-selection system was modified to attract more highly educated newcomers and those in the “skilled” classes.

As a result, the proportion of new immigrants aged 15 and older with university degrees rose from 17 per cent in 1992 to 45 per cent in 2004.

Furthermore, the share of newcomers with skilled qualifications increased from 29 per cent to 51 per cent.

The rapid increase throughout the 1990s in the share of arriving immigrants who were highly-educated and in the skilled economic class might have been expected to lower the chance of entering low-income, and increase the likelihood of leaving.

“This is because the more highly educated and “economic class” immigrants traditionally did better in the labour market,” the government agency says.

However, government researchers found the large increase in educated newcomers and a policy shift toward favouring skilled-class immigrants had only small impacts on their income levels.

“Overall, the large rise in educational attainment of entering immigrants and the shift to the skilled class immigrant had only a very small effect on poverty outcomes as measured by the probability of entry, exit and chronic rates,” Statistics Canada said.

In addition, the small advantage that the university-educated newcomers had over the high-school educated in the early 1990s had largely disappeared by 2000, as the number of highly educated immigrants rose.

Data for this study came from a database that combines the Longitudinal Administrative Database (LAD) and the Longitudinal Immigration Database (IMDB), and allows comparisons of known immigrants and other Canadians.

As a result, this study created a “comparison group” consisting of the Canadian-born, plus the immigrants who had been in Canada for more than 10 years.

The report compares results for recent immigrants to those of individuals in the comparison group of the same age.

20070130/新移民高学历并不意味着高收入

Recent immigrants not wealthier despite education: StatsCan
Last Updated: Tuesday, January 30, 2007 | 3:08 PM ET
CBC News
Income levels of new Canadian immigrants did not improve after 2000 even though they were better educated and more skilled than people coming to the country a decade earlier, Statistics Canada reported Tuesday.

A report by the federal agency says education and skill level did not make a difference in income because of the state of the economy.

Garnett Picot, a Statistics Canada analyst, said the agency believes the downturn suffered by the information technology industry at the beginning of the decade is responsible for the low income levels.

“The immigration system was quite successful in bringing in many more engineers and information technology workers than had been the case prior to that. And that continued into the early 2000s, and these people may have got caught up in the economic downturn,” he told CBC News.

Titled “Chronic low income and low-income dynamics among recent immigrants,” it examines the economic welfare of immigrant families and individuals. It also assesses their economic situation since 2000, the extent of chronic low income, and the impact of changes in education and skill classes on their economic well-being since 1993.

In 2002, the report said, low-income rates among immigrants during their first full year in Canada were 3.5 times higher than those of Canadian-born residents. By 2004, they had edged down to 3.2 times higher.

But for nearly one in five recent immigrants, the experience of low income was chronic, the report said.

Picot said low income, for the purposes of the study, has been defined as a family of four that earns less than $26,800 a year.

The report found the large increase in education of new immigrants and a policy shift that prefers the skilled class immigrant had only a small impact on improving new immigrant income levels.

In 1993, the federal government changed its selection system to attract more highly educated and skilled immigrants.

Subsequently, the proportion of new immigrants with university degrees rose to 45 per cent in 2004 from 17 per cent in 1992.

But that change, according to the report, did not translate into higher incomes, because skilled class new immigrants were actually more likely to begin life in Canada with low incomes.

Surviving 1st year a key
The report, however, was not all bad news.

“The probability of entering a period of low income was very high for immigrants during their first year in Canada. It ranged from 34 per cent to 46 per cent depending upon their year of arrival,” it said. “However, if immigrants did not enter a period of low income during their first year, the likelihood of that happening fell substantially to 10 per cent or less for subsequent years in Canada.

“The result was that for immigrants who arrived during the early 1990s, about 65 per cent entered low income at some time during their first 10 years in Canada. Of these, two-thirds did so during their first year.”

Calls for more government services
Charon Gill, CEO of the Progressive Intercultural Communites Services Society in Vancouver, said a contributing factor to low immigrant incomes is a lack of government services to help them use their skills.

“Immigrants come here. They feel they’re being dumped. They’re being ignored. They’re being left out on their own.”

Gill said many immigrants who arrive in Canada expect to use their education to begin a career, but he said they soon find out they need to upgrade to use those skills.

If they are not able to do so, they end up in low-wage jobs, he said.

According to the report, nearly one in five of recent immigrants who arrived between 1992 and 2000 were at a low income at least four years during their first five years in Canada. The rate was more than twice the corresponding rate of around eight per cent among people born in Canada.

For the group that arrived in 1993, the five-year chronic low-income rate was 20.5 per cent. For those who arrived in 2000, it had declined to 16.2 per cent as the economy improved.

The report said the rate declined because of improving economic conditions, not because of the education and skill levels of the immigrants.

“Overall, the large rise in educational attainment of entering immigrants and the shift to the skilled class immigrant had only a very small effect on poverty outcomes…,” the report said.

20070130/新移民仍面临低收入窘态

Immigrant pay steady despite skills: Study

Jan 30, 2007 09:53 AM
Canadian Press

OTTAWA – A new report suggests immigrants are financially no better off now than they were before the turn of the millennium, even though they have more education and skilled qualifications than a decade ago.

The report by Statistics Canada examines the economic welfare of immigrant families and individuals and assesses their economic situation since 2000, the extent of so-called “chronic” low income, and the impact of changes in education and skill classes on their economic well-being since 1993.

Government researchers found that the large increase in education among new immigrants and a policy shift toward favouring skilled-class immigrants had only small impacts on their income levels.

The immigrant selection system was modified in 1993 to attract more highly educated and skilled immigrants, helping boost the proportion with university degrees to 45 per cent in 2004 from 17 per cent in 1992.

The report says new immigrants’ chances of remaining out of low income were quite high if they escaped it in their first full year in Canada.

Immigrant pay lags despite more skills

Jan 30, 2007 11:18 AM
Prithi Yelaja
Staff Reporter

Despite having much higher levels of education, the economic plight of new immigrants to Canada remains less rosy than a decade ago, according to a new government report.

The report, released by Statistics Canada today, found that in 2002, immigrants during their first year in this country were 3.5 times more than likely than Canadian-born people to have low-incomes, though by 2004, the rate had dipped slightly to 3.2.

Those rates are up from the 1990s when they were about three times higher than those for Canadian-born people.

Low income was defined as a family of four living on less than $26,800 per year. The study included taxation data and landing records of immigrants from 1992 to 2004.

The low-income rates for newcomers has inched upward despite a shift in 1993 in Canada’s immigrant selection process with an emphasis on choosing more highly skilled labour such as engineers and information technology (IT) workers, said Garnett Picot, director general of the social and economic studies branch and the study’s author.

However, when those immigrants arrived, they were up against a downturn in the IT sector in 2000 when jobs were scarce.

Other barriers to new immigrants seeking work in Canada are of a more long-standing nature, said Picot.

“They get no credit for foreign work experience. There may be language and literacy issues. And there is very little research on the ability of the Canadian economy to absorb highly skilled workers.”

Canada produces large numbers of its own highly educated and skilled workers, so newcomers are competing with them for these plum jobs.

Timing is key to staying out of the low-income trap, according to the report. Depending on their year of arrival, immigrants had a 34 to 46 per cent probability of being low income. However, if they escaped low income in their first full year, the likelihood of that happening fell to 10 per cent or less during their subsequent years in Canada.

Even for those who did experience low-income, between 34 and 41 per cent left that category after one year, while one-third remained at that level after three years.

Immigrants still facing low incomes

Jan 30, 2007 03:05 PM
Prithi Yelaja
Staff Reporter

Despite having much higher levels of education, the economic plight of new immigrants to Canada remains less rosy than a decade ago, according to a new government report.

The report, released by Statistics Canada today, found that in 2002 immigrants during their first year in this country were 3.5 times more than likely than Canadian-born people to have low incomes, though by 2004 the rate had dipped slightly to 3.2.

Those rates are up from the 1990s when they were about three times higher than those born in Canada. Low income was defined as a family of four living on less than $26,800 per year. The low-income rates for newcomers have inched upward despite a shift in 1993 in Canada’s immigrant selection process.

20070130/研究显示:新移民经济状况十年无改善(附报告)

Tuesday, January 30, 2007

Study: Low-income rates among immigrants entering Canada

1992 to 2004

The economic situation of new immigrants to Canada showed no improvement after the turn of the millennium — despite the fact that they had much higher levels of education and many more were in the skilled immigrant class than a decade earlier, according to a new report.

The report examines the economic welfare of immigrant families, not just individuals. It assesses their economic situation since 2000, and the extent of “chronic” low income, and the impact of changes in education and skill classes on their economic well-being since 1993.

In 2002, low-income rates among immigrants during their first full year in Canada were 3.5 times higher than those of Canadian-born people. By 2004, they had edged down to 3.2 times higher.
These rates were higher than at any time during the 1990s, when they were around three times higher than rates for Canadian-born people.

The increase in low income was concentrated among immigrants who had just recently entered the country, that is, they had been here only one or two years. This suggests they had more problems adjusting over the short-term during the years since 2000.

One possible explanation may have been the downturn in the technology sector after 2000. The proportion of recent immigrants who were in occupations in information technology and engineering rose dramatically over the 1990s.

The report found that overall, the large increase in educational attainment of new immigrants, and the shift to the skilled class immigrant, had only a small impact on their likelihood of being in low income.

//******

Note to readers

Data for this study came from a database that combines the Longitudinal Administrative Database (LAD) and the Longitudinal Immigration Database (IMDB). The LAD is random, 20% sample of all taxfilers and their families. Individuals selected for the LAD are linked across years to create a longitudinal profile of each individual. The IMDB contains immigrant landing record and annual tax information for immigrants who have arrived since 1980. The LAD-IMDB allows comparisons of known immigrants and other Canadian taxfilers.

Outcomes for immigrants are ideally compared to those of the Canadian-born population.

However, in the LAD-IMDB it is not possible to separate immigrants in Canada for more than 10 years from the Canadian born.

As a result, this study created a “comparison group” consisting of the Canadian-born, plus immigrants who had been in Canada for more than 10 years. Their economic outcomes typically more closely resemble those of the Canadian-born than is the case for more recent immigrants. The report compares results for recent immigrants to those of individuals in the comparison group of the same age.

The analyses include individuals aged 20 years and over for calculating cross-sectional low-income rates. In analyses of low-income (entry, exit, and chronic low-income rates), only those aged 25 to 54 at landing were included.

In this study, low income is defined as family income below 50% of median income of the total population, adjusted for family size. The low-income cutoff is $26,800 (in 2003 constant dollars) for a family of four.

****//

In 1993, the selection system for immigrants was modified to attract more highly educated immigrants, as well as more in economic “skilled” classes.

As a result, among new immigrants aged 15 and older, the proportion with university degrees rose from 17% in 1992 to 45% in 2004. And the share in the economic skilled immigrant class increased from 29% to 51%.

Probability of entering and leaving a period of low income

The probability of entering a period of low income was very high for immigrants during their first year in Canada. It ranged from 34% to 46% depending upon their year of arrival.

However, if immigrants did not enter a period of low income during their first year, the likelihood of that happening fell substantially to 10% or less for subsequent years in Canada.

The result was that for immigrants who arrived during the early 1990s, about 65% entered low income at some time during their first 10 years in Canada. Of these, two-thirds did so during their first year.

If arriving immigrants escaped low income in their first full year, their chances of remaining out of low income were quite high.

For many, the first low-income spell was quite short. Between 34% and 41% exited after one year, depending on arrival cohorts. About one-third remained in their first period of low income after three years. However, even if they left a period of low income, it was possible they could re-enter at some later point.

The rapid increase throughout the 1990s in the share of arriving immigrants who were highly-educated and in the skilled economic class might have been expected to lower the chance of entering low-income, and increase the likelihood of leaving. This is because the more highly educated and “economic class” immigrants traditionally did better in the labour market.

However, the report shows that these changes had relatively little impact on entry and exit rates throughout the 1990s.

This was partly because there was only a small difference in low-income entry and exit patterns between immigrants who were more educated, and those with less education. Furthermore, by the early 2000s, immigrants in the skilled economic class were more likely to enter low income than their family-class counterparts.

For example, for the group that arrived in 2003, the probability of entering low income during the first year in Canada was about 2.3 percentage points lower than it would have been had the educational and class characteristics of the arriving immigrants not changed.

In contrast, the business cycle had a much bigger impact. The entry rate into low income fell by about 11.5 percentage points between the peak and the trough of the cycle.

Nearly a fifth of recent immigrants were in chronic low income

For the purposes of this report, “chronic” low income was defined as being in low income at least four of the first five years in Canada.

The report found that nearly one in five (18.5%) of recent immigrants who arrived between 1992 and 2000 were in low income at least four years during their first five years in Canada. This was more than twice the corresponding rate of around 8% among Canadian-born people.

For the group that arrived in 1993, the five-year chronic low-income rate was 20.5%. For those who arrived in 2000, it had declined to 16.2% as the economy improved.

There were two possible reasons for the decline: the more favorable labour market-related characteristics of immigrants entering in the late 1990s, and improving economic conditions (business cycle). The report found immigrant characteristics accounted for virtually none of the improvement; improving economic conditions accounted for the majority.

Overall, the large rise in educational attainment of entering immigrants and the shift to the skilled class immigrant had only a very small effect on poverty outcomes as measured by the probability of entry, exit and chronic rates.

This is because by the early 2000s, skilled class entering immigrants were actually more likely to enter low income and be in chronic low income than their family class counterparts.

In addition, the small advantage that the university educated entering immigrants had over, say, the high school educated in the early 1990s had largely disappeared by 2000, as the number of highly educated immigrants rose.

Changes in entering immigrant characteristics did alter the composition of the immigrants in chronic low income.

Among those who arrived in 2000, 52% of those in chronic low income were skilled economic immigrants. About 41% had university degrees, up from 13% in the 1993 cohort.

The research paper “Chronic low income and low-Income dynamics among recent immigrants” is now available as part of the Analytical Studies Branch Research Paper Series (11F0019MIE2007294, free) from the Publications module of our website.

Related studies from the Business and Labour Market Analysis Division can be found under Update on Analytical Studies Research (11-015-XIE, free) on our website.

For more information, or to enquire about the concepts, methods or data quality of this release, contact Garnett Picot (613-951-8214), Business and Labour Market Analysis Division.

研究报告:
http://blog.jackjia.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/01/immigrants_income_study.pdf

20070130/100个理由 微软讲述为何要选Vista系统

作者:徐文广

北京时间1月30日,微软公司在全球举行了个人版Vista操作系统同步发布会,在中国,微软选在北京的嘉里中心进行。在微软的官方网站上,我们也看到了微软对Vista更为详细的说明介绍,并列出了100个选择Vista系统的理由。

1. 它使得使用 PC 变得轻而易举

Windows Vista 採用了突破性设计和易于使用的组织工具,使完成工作和享受生活变得更为简单! 使用即时搜索,随时找到 PC 或 Web 上所需的内容。 凭借无与伦比的 Windows Aero 用户体验以及使您对正在使用的所有程序一目了然的 Windows Flip 3DA,从而使任务更为明晰。

2. 因为所有音乐距您只有一击之遥

只需按一下遥控器,即可导航和播放您的音乐收藏。 Windows 媒体中心和兼容的遥控器允许您按专辑、艺术家、专辑名称、歌曲、年份或流派以可视的方式快速搜索并选择歌曲。 共享您的媒体中心屏幕和遥控器,这样,每个人都有机会混合并播放他们喜爱的歌曲。

3. 迄今为止最为安全的 Windows 版本

Windows Vista 具有 Windows Defender、反垃圾邮件软件、仿冒网站筛选以及家长控制等新的安全工具,因此它可以为您的 PC、个人信息和家人提供比之前任何的 Windows 版本都安全的保护。 自动备份、性能自行配置和内置诊断帮助您保护数据并确保 PC 正常运行。

4. 以全新视角洞悉世界

Windows AeroA 用户界面的突破性设计为您的 PC 体验增添了清晰性。 其玻璃状透明的菜单栏使您可以透视应用程序窗口后面的一切内容,这种奇特的视觉效果使您距正在使用的所有程序只有一击之遥。

5. 它可以找到您所需的内容

Windows Vista 中所有的新搜索和组织工具帮助您快速找到硬盘或 Web 上所需的内容。 使用即时搜索快速找到 PC 上的文档、照片、电子邮件、歌曲、视频、文件或程序。

6. 因为您始终忙忙碌碌

Windows Vista 提供新的移动功能,使您保持高效的同时,可以随时随地进行娱乐。 Windows 移动中心、网络和共享中心与同步中心使用最新的日历、联系人和音乐帮助您保持连接并保持您的 PC 和便携式设备为最新。 选择超轻便 Tablet PCA,然后使用数字笔手写便条或随时随地制定草图。 使用笔记本 PC 上的 Windows 媒体中心M,您可以在休息时随时欣赏您喜爱的电视节目、电影、音乐和游戏。

7. 因为它可以让快乐时光停驻

使用 Windows 照片库轻松组织一生的照片和家庭电影。 按日期、关键字、星级或您选择任何识别标签来标记您的照片,以便在您需要时查找到这些照片。

8. 您的 PC 可以自行维护

性能自行配置、自修复技术、内置诊断和维护工具帮助您的计算机以最佳性能运行的同时,还提供了自动修复,使您可以在解决问题上花费更少的时间,从而更好地享受可靠的 PC 体验。

9. 突破移动 PC 的限制

网络和共享中心使您可以居家设置无线网络,从而享受在卧室、庭院或家中任何位置办公的自由。

10. 更安全地进行网上冲浪

在您联机时,Windows Internet Explorer 7 中的动态安全保护帮助保护您的 PC 和个人信息的安全。 Internet Explorer 7 还包括很多设计用于防止恶意软件的新功能。

11. 帮助保护孩子上网

通过允许您浏览可以限制对相应站点访问的控件的集中式家长控制,从而管理家庭对 Internet 站点的访问,为孩子营造更为安全的 Internet 体验。

12. 按您的时间安排节目

Windows 媒体中心M使您可以轻松地根据自己的时间观看您喜爱的电视节目。 使用兼容遥控器和内置电视指南查找、预设并录制现场电视,然后在您的台式机 PC、便携式计算机或电视屏幕上观看这些节目。 精彩情节不容错过!

13. 因为您需要了解哪些内容为恶意软件

Windows Internet Explorer 7 中的仿冒网站筛选和防反网页仿冒技术会在您浏览可疑或未知恶意网站时弹出警告,防止您的个人信息遭受欺诈。

14. 使任意房间都可以成为一个媒体中心

拥有 Windows 媒体中心M,在通过有线或无线家庭网络N连接 Xbox 360 和其他媒体中心扩展器后,您便可以在家中的任意房间访问并播放电视、音乐、照片和电影。 只用握着遥控器便可从电视或 PC 屏幕上选择您喜爱的娱乐节目,让快乐启程吧!

15. 因为 PC 会为您备份

Windows 备份和恢复中心提供改进的备份和恢复功能,将自动定期备份并保留珍贵的数码照片、音乐、电影和文档。

16. 立即配置并运行新的计算机

Windows 轻松传送通过自动将旧计算机上的文件、文件夹、设置和电子邮件等重要内容传送到新的计算机上,从而更加轻松地设置您的新计算机。

17. 就像拥有自己的私人播音员

Windows 侧栏可以将天气、新闻以及日历和其他应用程序等实时信息直接发送到您的桌面,以便您即时获取相关信息。 单击一下便可以更新至最新!

18. 创建自己的个人档案

计划和网络备份A帮助您防止数据丢失并将 PC 上的所有内容保存到指定的备份位置。 自动预设您的 PC,将您珍贵的数码照片、音乐、电影、电视节目和文档存档到网络上的其他计算机、硬盘N或其他介质上。

19. 在 PC 上观看实况电视

Windows 媒体中心M使您的 PC 成为一个功能强大的电视机! 将电视机输入设备连接到台式机或膝上型 PC 上,使用兼容的遥控器观看实况电视并可以随时暂停,因此您不会错过任何精彩情节。

20. 快速设置家庭网络

网络和共享中心让您掌控网络体验,因此您可以轻松地设置、使用和管理您的家庭网络! 连接到有线或无线网络,共享高速 Internet 连接和打印机,在两台计算机间相互复制文件,或者休息一下居家享受您喜爱的在线娱乐节目。

21. 在家享受更多欢乐时光

通过使用 Windows 媒体中心播放并观看您的电视屏幕,与家庭成员一起享受 Chess Titans、Mahjong Titan、激动人心的新型儿童学习游戏 Purble Place和其他第三方游戏。

22. 对正在使用的所有程序一目了然

借助新的 Windows Flip 3DA,您只用单击一下鼠标便可以在打开的所有文件和窗口之间快速浏览,从而轻松地查看并管理所有任务。

23. 因为它好似一个数字商店

您可以挑选电视、游戏、音乐、电影、家庭视频或照片幻灯片等,Windows Vista 在一个方便的位置提供所有的娱乐方式。 在 PC 上或者与朋友和家人一起在家庭娱乐中心体验各种娱乐方式,让快乐时光在此传递!

24. 因为您不用担心间谍软件

放轻松,您已得到很好的保护 ─ Windows Defender 通过自动扫描您的计算机并删除它查找到的所有有害软件,从而帮助您抵御由间谍软件所导致的弹出窗口、安全威胁和降低性能的攻击。

25. 它适用于您所需的软件、硬件和支持服务

Windows Vista 与大量软件应用程序、硬件设备和服务兼容以满足您的计算需求。 只要看到“Certified for Windows Vista”徽标,保証您可以得到顶级的 Windows Vista 体验。

26. 因为您是多重任务执行者

喜欢浏览交叉链接并在不同的网站间切换? Windows Internet Explorer 7 中的快速选项卡让您一眼即可看到所有打开网页的缩略图。

27. 因为您的计算机可在外出时随身携带

Windows 移动中心为您提供了一个中心位置以快速访问并设置电源、无线网络、同步和外接显示器等所有重要的移动系统设置。

28. 留住生活中的美好回忆

借助 Windows 媒体中心,在电视屏幕上共享大幅漂亮的照片和家庭视频,再现往日迷人风採。 全部的数码照片和视频库触手可及。添加自己的声音以设置聚会心情,或者将遥控器传给朋友和家人,让他们参与到快乐行动中!

29. 採用手写的方法

Windows Vista 提供数字墨水输入和手写功能,以便您随时随地高效地使用。 借助 Tablet 和触摸技术,只用在超轻便的 Tablet PC 上轻触一下数字笔,便可以手写便条、制作草图并快速地在文件或网站间导航。

30. 即时还原您的 PC

Windows Complete PC 备份和还原B为您 PC 的硬盘拍摄精确的“照片”,从而允许您为包括个人文件、系统文件、程序和设置在内的整个 PC 创建完整备份,以便在系统需要全部还原时使用。

31. 因为 PC 会提示您哪里出现故障并帮助您修复故障

Windows Vista 会在潜在的危险软件尝试在您的计算机运行时向您发出警报,还会在重要资源比较低时进行提醒以保护您的 PC 可以顺利运行。 如果当前设置在您联机浏览网页时可能存在风险,Windows Internet Explorer 7 会进行相应的提示,然后您便可以轻松地将其修复。

32. 在整个企业范围内简化 IT 管理

使用 Windows Vista 中的扩展组策略支持,在整个企业网络中集中化管理 PC 配置安全性和网络设置,允许用户从脱机服务器或者网络上的多台 PC 访问数据。

33. 保留一生美好回忆

计划和网络备份允许您将照片和视频自动备份到家庭网络上的其他 PC 或硬盘上,因此无需担心会丢失这些珍贵的回忆。 使用 Windows DVD Maker 将照片和视频刻录到 CD 或 DVD 上,这样便可以流传下来并在未来的某些时候通过 PC 或 DVD 播放器重温这些美好时刻。

34. 连接到公司或学校网络

加入域D使得将计算机连接到公司或学校网络更为简单,这些网络对具有域用户名和密码的用户设置了访问限制。

35. 因为在您看到它时便明白一切

更快地目视搜索和识别您的文件。 Windows Vista 中每个文件的图标是实际文件的小型直观视图,因此您看一眼便可以确定该文件是不是您在查找的文件。 视频文件将播放完整视频的某个短小片段。 根据自己的喜好调整图标大小,从而使搜索过程更加轻松。

36. 需要时可“重新操作”

使用您的照片尝试您喜欢的方式 借助 Windows 照片库查看器,您的原始照片会被自动保存以方便您查看或者以其他方式重新使用它。

37. 将信息保存在安全的位置

Windows BitLocker 驱动器加密B提供了全卷加密和启动整体检查,以确保兼容膝上型 PC 上的数据处于机密状态,即使它丢失或者失窃。

38. 它可以消除红眼

使用 Windows 照片库中的剪裁、消除红眼和单击自动调整等易用使用的内置工具来补偿数码照片的顏色和曝光度。

39. 重温自己和大家的美好回忆

Windows 照片库使查找、欣赏并分享这些特殊照片的过程更加轻松。 按日期、地方、人物、星级或者您选择使用的任何关键字标记组织照片。 即时查找照片或使用内置即时搜索瞬间从数以千计的照片中进行搜索。

40. 因为您爱您的工作

凭借很多新的导航和组织工具,Windows Vista 几乎可以在您的 PC 上更快、更好地执行一切操作。 灵活的信息管理工具允许您以自己的方式即时查找并查看文件,以便快速地通过“任务”列表并聚焦在您喜爱的内容上。

41. 因为您的 PC 会自动更新为最新

Windows Update 会为您的计算机定期查看最新的重要更新并自动下载并安装该更新,所以您可以放心您的计算机始终保持为最新。

42. 电邮您的照片而无需担心文件大小

Windows 照片库允许您轻松地压缩照片和家庭视频以便通过电子邮件进行共享。 照片视频电子邮件向导指导您完成减小文件大小的整个过程,只需几步便可将您珍贵的回忆发送出去!

43. 易于家长操作

为孩子的 PC 时间设定规则。 借助 Windows Vista 中易于使用的家长控制,您可以设置对游戏、Internet 使用、应用程序,甚至使用时间的限制,从而帮助孩子更高效地使用 PC。

44. 因为您有速度需求

需要加速您的计算机吗? 只用将 USB 记忆棒插入台式机或便携式计算机上,然后让 Windows ReadyBoost 执行其他一切操作。

45. 因为您讨厌那些盒盒线线

借助 Windows 媒体中心M,您可以将您喜爱的电视、音响、DVR、游戏设备和个人计算机等消费电子设备存放在一个整齐的软件包中,让配置了 Windows Vista 的 PC 成为完美的娱乐解决方案。

46. 音乐不仅悦耳动听,看起来也要赏心悦目

帮助 Windows Media Player 11 更清楚地看音乐:可自定义的音乐集唱片海报和堆叠视图,可以轻松地查找并分享您最喜爱的音乐。

47. 让快乐现在启程吧

更快地目视查找您喜爱的娱乐方式。 Windows 媒体中心M显示缩略图,您可以快速地通过专辑(也可以通过照片、电影或电视节目)和图像识别您的音乐,以便您在找到后可以立即欣赏。

48. 随时随地保持联系

当您外出时,Windows Vista 中改进的无线网络使您可以轻松地加入公司、家庭或您喜爱的公共热点的无线网络,这样您可以在 Internet 上冲浪、处理业务或随时随地保持联系。

49. 随身携带公司业务

无论身在何处,保持联系并保持工作效率! 同步中心允许您轻松地在一个公共位置保持其他 PC、服务器共享、共享文档、数字媒体设备、智能电话、Pocket PC 和其他设备与您 PC 的同步。

50. 从 Web 获取更多内容

Windows Internet Explorer 7 中的选项卡式浏览允许您在一个窗口同时浏览 Internet 上的多个页面。

51. 因为您要享受生活

Windows 游戏资源管理器使安装、组织和播放游戏更为简单。 可以轻松地访问每个游戏的缩略图并获取详细信息,如游戏发行商、每个游戏的类型和等级,以及上次玩游戏的时间。

52. 控制游戏时间

使用设置时间限制和控制对游戏访问的工具,根据游戏的相应内容为您的家人管理玩游戏的时间。 游戏资源管理器允许您根据游戏名称、等级、类别或者内容查看并组织游戏。 家长控制使您可以更轻松地监控孩子的游戏活动并限制其对不适当游戏的访问。

53. 一起协作,事半功倍

使用 Windows 会议室A 邀请朋友或同事通过 Internet、公司网络或者对等无线网络处理项目相关事宜。传递课堂笔记、在喜爱热点互换照片或者共享您的桌面以编辑文档或撰写便条。

54. 随时随地保持娱乐

借助 Windows 媒体中心,使用便携式笔记本 PC 录制或观看喜爱的节目和电影,然后在飞机或酒店房间进行观看。

55. 因为今天成就明天的辉煌

Windows Vista 使查找、使用和共享文档、调查和其他学校作业变得更为简单。 按日期、地方或人物组织文件或者选择任意的字符标记他们,您便可以即时找到所需内容。

56. 打印您所看到的内容

Windows Internet Explorer 7 通过自动将页面调整为打印纸的尺寸以避免图像被切割开,还允许您仅打印选中的文本或图像,让您可以准确地打印出在 Web 上看到的内容,从而减少打印浪费。

57. 因为观看家庭电影不再依赖于 PC

Windows DVD MakerU 允许您轻松制作外观专业的照片和家庭电影 DVD,其中包括可以在家庭 DVD 播放器中欣赏的过渡和章节。 这使得与所有亲朋好友共享家庭活动的数码照片和视频更加简单,即使他们在没有 PC 的情况下也可以观看。

58. 让音乐充满房间

Windows Media Player 11 中的媒体共享功能允许您随时随地通过家庭网络查找、访问和收听数码音乐集。通过 PC 到 PC 共享、数字媒体接收器和其他连接到网络的设备,您可以在家中的任一房间或多个房间享受动感生活。

59. 创造杰作

将您的照片和家庭视频制作成一部情节丰富的电影,配上声音、字幕、致谢名单并加上有创意的过渡。

60. 因为您希望看到栩栩如生的视频回忆

Windows Movie Maker 让您从 HD 摄像放像机捕获、编辑和发布电影时保持高清晰度(HD)质量。

61. 强有力地阻止黑客

具有高级安全功能且易于使用的 Windows 防火墙提供了高级保护,保护您和您的 PC 免遭恶意攻击。

62. 因为它了解您的工作习惯,帮助您更快地执行操作

Windows SuperFetch 通过跟踪最经常使用的应用程序并将其预先加载到内存以便快速访问,从而帮助改善 PC 的响应速度并使系统的性能更加稳定。

63. 帮助随处可见

无论您是首次使用还是一位专家,内置的帮助系统专门用于帮助您快速了解新任务、提供逐步支持并解决 Windows Vista 没有为您自动解决的问题。

64. 保持文件的机密性

加密文件系统D (EFS) 允许您加密文件和文件夹,因此如果两个人在共享 PC,用户的数据不会显示给对方。 Windows Vista 允许您将 EFS 密钥存储在智能卡上,这样您便可以更轻松地管理 EFS。

65. 现场发送传真

Windows 传真和扫描使您可以像使用电子邮件一样轻松直接地从 PC 发送和接收传真。 传真模板链接到您的地址簿,您可以很轻松地检索传真号码、附加您的文档,然后单击“发送”即可。

66. 因为每个人都有粗心的时候

您是否曾意外地复盖、删除或忘记保存您正在处理的文件? 在您工作时,卷影副本通过自动创建捕获文件的旧版本的每日“还原点”,帮助防止数据的意外丢失。 快速轻松地检索您可能意外删除的文档,即使您从未备份文件。

67. 因为电子邮件是联系的纽带

Windows Mail 具有帮助您保持联系并且聚焦最为重要的邮件的新工具,还具有新的邮件筛选器防止垃圾邮件、网页仿冒攻击和恶意附件的攻击。 内置即时搜索使您可以快速地查找任何电子邮件,即使需要从成千封邮件中挑选出来。

68. 掌握家庭日程

Windows 日历允许您设置共享的家庭日历和自动警报,因此您决不会错过重要事情 ─ 无论是家庭聚会,还是支付每月帐单的提醒。

69. 因为您需要打印输出的质量匹配您的工作质量

Windows Vista 为兼容的打印机带来新一代打印技术,它以丰富的色彩打印出更逼真的照片、实现高保真打印输出、减少错误打印造成的浪费,提高其性能以降低打印时间。

70. PC 随时作好准备供您使用

Windows Vista 具有新的睡眠电源状态,使您可以随时使用计算机,从而省去等待计算机启动的时间。 将您的 PC 处于睡眠状态,从而将文档、应用程序和数据保存到硬盘和内存上,然后在几秒内还原到之前工作会话。

71. 将您喜爱的内容放在最方便的位置

随时单击一下,搜索文件夹便会保存搜索并即时运行。 根据常用关键词或者其他标准设计并保存搜索,这样,不管您 PC 所处位置,每次运行搜索时现有的文件和新文件将自动显示在“搜索文件夹”中。

72. 向您的桌面发送最新新闻

Windows Internet Explorer 7 自动检测 RSS 提要,从而将个性化的体育、新闻或购物提要直接发送给您,这样您不必访问每个网站即可在一个位置获得最新信息。

73. 因为您的照片和家庭电影无需堆积在 PC 上

Windows Vista 使您可以更简单地与朋友和家人共享回忆,无论他们在您的身边还是在千里之外。 在家中的 PC 或电视屏幕上放映丰富的多媒体幻灯片。 使用兼容的遥控器M将照片和带有声音的家庭视频轻松地刻录到 CD 或 DVDU 上,或者使用 Windows 照片库中的电子邮件向导自动重新调整照片大小并发送照片。

74. 因为您的回忆需要心情音乐的点缀

Windows 媒体中心M使您可以为您喜爱的照片的电影幻灯片配上音乐,然后使用遥控器从您的音乐库中选择旋律,营造恰当的怀旧心情。

75. 因为您希望从自己的打印机上打印出外观专业的照片

Windows 照片库指导您实现易于使用、高保真的居家照片打印体验。 使用明朗、准确的顏色、以较大的相纸尺寸和国际照片大小无边框自定义冲洗您的照片。

76. 因为所有亲朋好友都希望具有这张特殊照片的副本

Windows 照片库使您可以轻松地通过 InternetI 订购各种大小、不同的表面光洁度以及任意数量的专业照片进行邮递或在附近的冲印店选取。 即时订购照片 ─ 只用单击一下便可从您首选的零售照片冲印店联机订购。

77. 即时捕获精彩时刻。 同时快速将其松开

通过将照片导入 Windows 照片库的简单过程,快速将相机中的照片传送到您的计算机上。

78. 因为您有多种方式让音乐无处不在

使用 Windows Media Player 11,快速简单地将 PC 上的音乐文件发送到您喜爱的兼容便携式音乐设备上。 PlaysForSure 确保音乐会清晰明快地传送出来,因此您可以随时随地享受音乐带来的无限快乐!

79. 让您的音乐集随您一起成长

Windows Media Player 11 使收藏数字音乐更加简单,它所具有的新工具可以让您轻松地将 CD 录制到 PC,可以从联机音乐服务I获取新歌曲或订阅,享受与您便携式设备的无缝连接。

80. 因为您是媒体的主宰

观看电视、将节目刻录到 CD 或 DVD、下载电影和录制大型游戏─使用 Windows 媒体中心让一切同时进行。

81. 因为它使电视更加智能化

将 PC 连接到电视机后,Windows 媒体中心使您可以直接从电视获取新闻、下载电影并从知名公司获取其他信息和娱乐节目。使用媒体中心电视指南,从电视屏幕上对您喜爱的电视连续剧预设录制,然后便可以随时观看,而不用按照网络计划的播放时间进行。将电视提升到新的层次,可通过电视的大屏幕欣赏包括照片、家庭视频和音乐在内的所有数字娱乐。

82. 展示您的新型家庭娱乐中心:PC

录制和观看实况电视。 播放电影。 聆听您喜爱的音乐。 查看照片和家庭视频。 使用 Windows 媒体中心和兼容遥控器,从舒适的沙发上享受高保真画面和环绕立体声。 将 PC 连接到电视,享受大屏幕的体验。 将 Xbox 360 连接到有线或无线家庭网络,即可在家中的任意房间享受娱乐。

83. 这使得台式机活力倍增

Windows 通过让您体验家庭电影或其他视频剪辑般的全动态视觉效果,从而使您的 PC 台式机超越了简单的静态墙纸图像视觉效果。

84. 轻松享受,一切交给遥控器

Windows 媒体中心使您可以比以往更轻松地通过遥控器访问和享受所有您喜爱的数字娱乐。 观看实况或录制的电视节目、下载电影、放映家庭视频作品、在电视或 PC 屏幕上观看配音的电影幻灯片─然后将遥控器传递给朋友和家人,与大家一起分享其中的乐趣!

85. PC 可以使用多种语言

支持多种用户界面语言意味着多语言家庭或学习语言的人可以在 PC 上安装多种语言,而且无需重新启动计算机即可在语言之间进行切换。

86. 存档媒体库

计划的和网络备份使您可以将录制的电视节目、歌曲、专辑和播放列表自动备份到家庭网络上的其他 PC 或硬盘上─因此无需担心会丢失您喜爱的娱乐节目。 通过 Windows DVD Maker 将数字媒体刻录到 DVD 并创建媒体存档,您可以随时在 PC 或 DVD 播放器上欣赏。

87. 玩最热门的新游戏

从简单到复杂,不同年龄、不同层次的人均可在 PC 上或者联机体验属于自己的游戏。 在 PC 上享受象棋高手、麻将高手、Purble Place 和墨球等全新 Windows Vista 顶级游戏带来的无穷乐趣。

88. 感受顶级的游戏体验

使用超级逼真的 3D 图形,体验最新的高性能游戏。 DirectX 10 技术使得游戏更加引人入胜,它允许 PC 和 Xbox 360 使用相同的游戏控制器。 凭借更快的性能和更稳定的连接,感受与最好的朋友或者世界各地的其他游戏玩家在线交锋的超酷体验。

89. 让游戏随身携带

无论走到哪里,您随时可以在安装 Windows Vista 的膝上型 PC 上享受您喜爱的 PC 或在线游戏。 更快、更稳定的连接性让您始终与家中或世界各地的游戏玩家保持连接。

90. 无需打开 PC 即可查收电子邮件

Windows SideShow 使您甚至在 PC 关闭的情况下也能读取电子邮件、确认会议地点或检查航程预订情况! 您可以在配备辅助显示器的便携式计算机和其他设备上查看重要信息,无论便携式计算机是否关闭或处于睡眠模式。

91. 让快乐永远相伴

同步中心为您提供一个便利的位置,在该位置上您可以保持照片、音乐、录制的电视和其他数字娱乐内容与其他 PC、服务器共享、共享文档、数字媒体设备、智能电话、Pocket PC 和其他设备的同步。

92. 耳听不如眼见

借助 Tablet PC 和数字笔,您可以轻松地捕获屏幕上任何对象的屏幕截图,即使是网站、文档或程序的部分内容。 将此图片粘贴到电子邮件、文档、IM 或其他数字对话中以清楚地解释自己的观点。

93. 以自己的方式工作

Tablet 和触摸技术为您提供了与 PC 交互的新选项 ─ 如果您的计算机可以执行触摸输入,您可以使用手指执行很多需要鼠标或 Tablet 笔执行的任务。

94. 因为您希望无线连接能够更安全

Windows Vista 增强了对新的无线安全协议(包括 WPA2)的支持,进一步确保无线连接将更加非常安全。

95. 随身携带网络文件和文件夹

脱机工作一样保持高效。 公司漫游与脱机文件和文件夹允许您通过 PC 携带网络文件和文件夹,并在您连接至公司网络后自动高效地与服务器进行同步。

96. 随时随地访问您的桌面

远程桌面帮助您轻松安全地通过家庭网络或者通过其他计算机上的 Internet 远程访问计算机上的文档和程序,这样在具有 Internet 连接的任何位置,您都可以完成工作。

97. 因为您的企业只需要一台扫描仪

借助 Windows 传真和扫描,只用单击一下,您便可以直接从连接到您的 PC 或连接到您的网络的其他位置的扫描仪和多功能设备扫描文档和图像。 调整您的图像设置、获取活动预览并通过路由列表共享扫描的文档。

98. 使您的演示文稿更具专业水准

网络投影通过使您简单地连接到有线或无线联网投影仪,从而允许您共享演示文稿、照片和幻灯片。既然是无线连接,因此您不必共享电缆或者移动设备,也不用刻意选择屏上桌面显示的外观以留下深刻的印象。

99. 因为在您共享信息时您会获得更多内容

改进的文件和文件夹共享功能,通过使您轻松地查找并配置如指定您要共享文件的对象以及要启用的访问级别等共享功能,从而允许您更高效地与网络上的其他人共享文件夹和文件。

100. 因为网络是企业的支柱

网络诊断和故障排查提供专门用于帮助您识别并快速解决网络连接问题的内置诊断程序。

某些产品功能 仅在特定版本的 Windows Vista 中才提供,并且可能需要高级硬件或附加硬件。

20070130/中国国家名片–还原人民币背后的风景(组图)

钱币被称为“国家名片”,人民币则是中国的名片。目前人民币一共发行了五套,你想知道都有哪些风景曾被荣幸地印上它们的背面,在担负商品交换媒介职能的同时,也在960平方公里的土地上传递着浓缩自然、历史、文化为一体的中国精神吗?近日,一网络牛人用相机拍下了这些人民币背后的风景,并在猫扑网上发帖,引众网友惊叹不已。

第一套人民币第3版100元背面 

颐和园万寿山

颐和园,位于北京城西北郊,原清代皇家花园和行宫,距离天安门20公里整。颐和园因是集中国园林建筑艺术之大成的杰作,也是世界最著名的皇家园林之一。颐和园在1998年11月成功申请为世界文化遗产。

第一套人民币第5版100元背面

北海公园

北海公园位于北京市区的中心,是中国现存历史最悠久、保存最完整的皇家园林之一,距今已有近千年的历史。全园占地68公顷(其中水面39公顷),主要由琼华岛、东岸、北岸景区组成。北海园林的开发始于辽代。1925年北海辟为公园对外开放。

第二套人民币2元背面

延安宝塔山

延安宝塔山古称嘉岭山,位于延安城东南,延河之滨。在山上可鸟瞰延安整个城区。因山上有塔,通常称作宝塔山。山高1135.5米,山上宝塔始建于唐,现为明代建筑。平面八角形,九层,高约44米,楼阁式砖塔。宝塔山是革命圣地延安的重要标志和象征,“只有登上宝塔山,才算真正到了延安”。

第二套人民币3元背面

井冈山龙源口石桥

龙源口位于井冈山下,是与井冈山资源共享的国家级风景区,井冈山斗争的第一个保卫战和红军史上第一个大胜仗——龙源口大捷在这里发生;境内还有在井冈山时期毛主席亲自创建的第一个农村党支部——秋溪党支部旧址。这里是爱国主义教育基地,也是休闲度假、疗养健身的好去处。

第四套人民币1元背面

八达岭长城

八达岭长城史称天下九塞之一,是万里长城的精华和杰出代表,也是万里长城向游人开放最早的地段。八达岭地理环境优越,自古以来就是通往山西、内蒙、张家口的交通要道。迄今,八达岭长城已接待中外游客1.2亿多人次,370多位外国元首及世界风云人物在此留下足迹。

第四套人民币2元背面

南天一柱

钱币上的图案做了艺术处理——让巨石屹立在大浪之中,显得雄浑壮观,实际上这块石头的位置是在沙滩上。科学家说近年气候变暖海面上升,也许有一天2元人民币上的图案会变成现实。“南天一柱”据说是清代宣统年间崖州知州范云梯所书。

第四套人民币5元背面

巫峡

巫峡自巫山县城东大宁河起,至巴东县官渡口止,全长46公里,有大峡之称,以幽深秀丽擅奇于天下。巫峡两岸群峰,以十二峰为奇,它们各具特色,尤以神女峰最为纤丽奇俏。“秀峰岂止十二座,更有零星百万峰”。巫峡是三峡最连贯、最整齐的峡谷。

第四套人民币10元背面

珠穆朗玛峰

珠穆朗玛峰是世界最高的山峰,海拔8848.13米。它的地位正如它的高度,是永远不能被忽视的。珠穆朗玛峰位于我国和尼泊尔交界的地方,从中国境内眺望珠峰,它像一座金字塔,威严地耸立在一排雪峰之间。这张钱币整体色调以蓝色为主,设计它的时候就考虑到珠峰适合这种冷色调来表现。1989年国家建立珠峰自然保护区。

第四套人民币50元背面

黄河壶口瀑布

壶口瀑布是黄河流域的一大奇观,它是中国第二大瀑布。壶口位于陕西省宜川县与山西省吉县交界处。黄河流至壶口时,宽约400米的河床突然收缩到四五十米,河水奔腾倾泻而下,犹如从一巨型壶口倾倒出,所以起名“壶口”。由于河水的侵蚀作用,壶口瀑布每年都会向上游移动一小段距离,现在10元钱币上这个场景,几百年后会永远地消失在咆哮的黄河水中。

第四套人民币100元背面

井冈山

井冈山位于江西省西南部,地处湘赣两省交界的罗霄山脉的中段,古有“郴衡湘赣之交,千里罗霄之腹”之称。1927年,中国共产党在井冈山创建了中国第一个农村革命根据地。在中国革命的史册上,井岗山被誉为“中国革命的摇篮”、“中华人民共和国的奠基石”、“天下第一山”。

第五套人民币1元背面

三潭印月

人民币上的图案并非完全写实,摄影师所在角度只能拍到两座石塔。三潭印月,杭州西湖十景之一,位于西湖中部偏南,与湖心亭、阮公墩鼎足而立合称“湖中三岛”,犹如我国古代传说中的蓬莱三岛,故又称小瀛洲。北宋时已成为湖上赏月佳处。明人张宁诗云:“片月生沧海,三潭处处明。夜船歌舞处,人在镜中行。”

第五套人民币5元背面

泰山观日峰

第五套人民币5元的背面图案是泰山,不过这个图案采用了空间“蒙太奇”的手法,把“五岳独尊”的石刻和泰山主峰两个场景放到一起,在现实中是看不到这样的景观的。泰山可以说是中国文化的第一高山,虽然它的海拔只有1546米,但却有极崇高的地位,是帝王祭祀天空和大地的地方,首先向世人宣布自己的皇权是顺应天道的。

第五套人民币10元背面

夔门

夔门,在瞿塘峡入口处是长江三峡的西大门,又名“瞿塘关”,在巍峨壮丽的白帝城下,是出入四川盆地的门户。从白帝城向东,便进入长江三峡中最西面的瞿塘峡,全长约8公里,在三峡中最短,却最为雄伟险峻。杜甫诗云:“白帝高为三峡镇,瞿塘险过百牢关。”

第五套人民币20元背面

桂林山水

桂林山水甲天下,国家的名片上怎么能少了这“天下第一”的风景?桂林是世界著名的风景游览城市,漓江水清澈秀丽,有着举世无双的喀斯特地貌。“山青、水秀、洞奇、石美”是桂林“四绝”。

第五套人民币50元背面

西藏布达拉宫

为了制作第五套人民币50元券的布达拉宫,上海印钞造币厂的两位高级美工来到拉萨考察。他们寻找很久,最终在一个水厂的厂房顶上找到“最佳角度”。他们先在这里拍照片、画素描图,经过反复修改和雕琢,最终设计出人民币上的图案。

布达拉宫始建于公元7世纪,是藏王松赞干布为远嫁西藏的唐朝文成公主而建。在拉萨海拔3700多米的红山上建造了999间房屋的宫宇。宫体主楼13层,高115米。

(信息时报)

20070129/加拿大最低工资的立法历史及现状

Tag:

In Depth: Minimum wage laws – The state of pay in Canada
Last Updated January 29, 2007
CBC News

Most Canadians have had only fleeting contact with the minimum wage. Perhaps that first job as a teenager in a fast food restaurant or working at the cash register of a local store. Then, it was on to bigger and better-paying jobs.

But minimum wage employment is still the reality for many in this country. Some never manage to rise above those so-called entry-level positions. In 2007, for someone working full-time, that means an annual income of less than $16,000. Some try to support a family on that.

Minimum wage
Number of Canadians working at or below minimum wage in 2005:
587,000 (4.3% of all employees)
Source: Source: Statistics Canada

The minimum wage is designed to impose a broad and enforceable standard on employers that would guarantee a minimum level of income for unskilled, non-unionized workers. Minimum wage standards are also designed to stop these workers from trying to undercut each other by agreeing to work for less than someone else.

The minimum wage also serves as a benchmark for many more workers who are paid above the minimum wage. Many of these better-paid employees also see their wages rise when the minimum wage is bumped up.

History of minimum wage legislation

If you found yourself as an unskilled, uneducated worker in the 19th Century, you were on your own in Canada. There were no minimum wage standards anywhere in the country; no labour code to protect you from exploitation. Employers could pay workers as little as they wanted and many did just that. Craft unions arrived in the latter part of the century and were often able to win improvements in pay and working conditions. By 1912, as many as 160,000 Canadians were members of a union – often in such areas as mining and the railways.

The first minimum wage legislation in Canada was passed in 1918 by both British Columbia and Manitoba. Two years later, Ontario, Quebec, Nova Scotia, and Manitoba followed suit. Interestingly, these early wage laws applied only to women and only to some kinds of employment. According to a labour law analysis by Human Resources Development Canada, the thinking at the time was that labour unions (which represented male workers) could do a better job of ensuring that men earned a living wage by bargaining on their behalf.

Hourly minimum pay for adults (as of Feb. 1, 2007) Province Wage
B.C. $8.00
Alberta $7.00
Saskatchewan $7.55
Manitoba $7.60
Ontario $8.00
Quebec $7.75
New Brunswick $7.00
Nova Scotia $7.15
P.E.I. $7.15
Newfoundland $7.00
Northwest Territories $8.25
Nunavut $8.50
Yukon $8.25

Other provinces and territories gradually brought in minimum wage legislation for women and men, with Prince Edward Island being the last province to do so in 1960. For many years, provinces also legislated higher minimum wages for men than for women. The prevailing thinking was that men deserved more pay because the family’s main breadwinner was usually male. Gender-based minimum wage rates weren’t abolished in all provinces until 1974.

There used to be a federal minimum wage too. That applied to workers whose jobs were covered under the Canada Labour Code – like those in banking and the railways. But in 1996, the current provincial or territorial rates were adopted as the federal minimums.

At one point, many provinces also had higher minimums for workers in urban centers than for those in rural areas – a distinction that disappeared by the 1970s.

Currently, minimum wage rates in Canada vary by less than $2 an hour between the highest and lowest standards. The minimums generally do not automatically increase according to the inflation rate, but are adjusted on an ad-hoc basis by provincial and territorial governments. On April 1, 2007, Yukon becomes the first jurisdiction to peg annual increases in its minimum wage to the Consumer Price Index. A few provinces are bound by statute to review the minimum wage standard every year or two, but none is required to change it. Critics point out that the legislated minimums have often not kept pace with inflation.

All provinces provide for fines for employers who pay covered employees less than the prescribed minimums.

Are there exceptions to the basic minimum wage rates?

Yes, and lots of them. Millions of Canadian workers are not covered by minimum wage laws. Self-employed workers, independent contractors, students in training programs, and salespeople paid exclusively by commission are almost never covered in any province or territory.

Most provinces also have their own rules that either exclude some kinds of workers from minimum wage coverage or allow lower minimum rates for some kinds of workers.

Some provinces, for instance, allow employers to pay less to workers who serve alcohol or otherwise accept tips. Ontario is the only province that still allows young workers to be paid less than adults. New Brunswick says domestic workers and live-in care workers aren’t covered by minimum wage laws. In some other provinces, domestics are covered, but nannies aren’t. Farm labour and homeworkers are usually not covered, but there are exceptions there too. And depending on the jurisdiction, camp counsellors, hunting and fishing guides, and inexperienced workers may also have lower minimum wage provisions.

Does the minimum wage prevent poverty?

Just about everyone agrees that a minimum wage is not a living wage. It’s virtually impossible to live independently on $16,000 a year in any major Canadian city.

The Vanier Institute of the Family, in its 2005 submission to the Federal Labour Standards Review, said the minimum wage in now “not even close” to being a living wage. “No longer can a minimum wage employee hope to provide for a family,” it said. “Even two minimum wages in a household will not protect its children from the short-term and long-term consequences of poverty.” Similarly, research by Campaign 2000 (which fights child and family poverty) said 45 per cent of all low income children in 2002 lived in families where at least one parent worked full-time.

In 2005, the Canadian Labour Congress said a single person working full-time in Canada needed an hourly rate of at least $10 to reach a poverty-line income. The CLC estimates that a quarter of all workers make less than that. Women, visible minorities, part-timers, people with disabilities, those with less than a high school diploma, and recent immigrants are over-represented in the lowest-paid ranks.

So what’s the solution? Some say raising minimum rates to $10 an hour is a good place to start. But the Canadian Chamber of Commerce says higher minimum wages cost jobs for young and unskilled workers. “It is estimated that a 10 per cent increase in the minimum wage results in a 2.5 per cent decline in employment,” the Chamber said in a 2005 paper calling for changes to the Canada Labour Code. The Chamber also cited research that associated high minimum wage rates with higher school dropout rates, as teenagers are persuaded to leave school.

Others have suggested that simply raising the minimum wage may not be the best poverty-fighting mechanism. They suggest wage supplements for the working poor. The labour movement also says it’s no coincidence that the lowest paid jobs are typically non-union. And others say better wages will result when the quality of jobs improves.

Main sources: Human Resources Development Canada Database on Minimum Wages, Canadian Labour Congress, Campaign 2000, Vanier Institute of the Family, Canadian Chamber of Commerce, Statistics Canada.

20070129/星岛日报与加拿大广播公司携手推出“移民梦想与现实”系列报道

星岛日报/

报纸结合电台力量:缘起

加拿大向各国招揽移民时,声称加国是非常适合技术人才发挥所长的理想居住地。不过,这种促销手法有多少真实?多少人找到理想?他们当初对加国有怎样的期盼?后来又怎样为生活打拚?理想和现实落差究竟多大?……

《星岛日报》现与加拿大广播公司(CBC)英语电台晨间访谈节目《The Early Edition》携手合作同步推出“移民梦想与现实”系列报道,逐日推出深入探讨新移民面对困境的专题内容;而CBC相关节目称为《推销加拿大》(The Great Sales Job),早上在690 AM台播出。

本报高级记者杨婉文和崔源明连日展开跨地采访,结合CBC电台的资讯,致力为读者揭开新移民在加国生活的各种挣扎和奋斗历程。而CBC 690 AM台《The Early Edition》副监制雪雷莉.杜宾(Shiral Tobin),对于移民在加国用非所学情况有深切了解。在她努力下,终促成今次报纸与电台联手报道新移民实况的计划。

CBC 690 AM台《The Early Edition》节目,由资深广播人柯乐福(Rick Cluff)主持。电台网址www.cbc.ca/earlyedition,听众专线604-662-6690,电子邮箱earlyed@vancouver.cbc.ca。该节目乐意接到读者的中文电话或中文电子邮件。

20070129/加学界女性待遇远逊男士

加通社多伦多电/最新发布的一项调查显示,尽管女性在加拿大学术界的地位有所提高,但男女差异在学界仍然相当明显。特别是在学界高层,女性教授无论在代表性还是在薪酬方面,都不如男性同事。

统计显示,2004-05年,大学教职员中女性占1/3,不过正教授中,女性只有19%,比1990-91年的8%有所上升。而在新获聘教员层次,女性比例只有14%,和1990-91年的12%相比,上升幅度不大。在收入上,女性正教授的中位收入比男教授低6,000元,副教授低1,800元。

在学术界进阶,应该以学术成就为标准,通常的指标是申请人的研究成果、著作情况和教学成就。不过根据安省温莎大学的招聘主管黛拉奇(Janice Drakich)教授的统计,影响晋级的不仅有学术成就,而存在“系统的性别歧视”。

她和约克大学人类学副教授潘史超域(Penni Stewart)在2月号的“学术事务”发表文章指出,自1988年以来,加拿大大学中的女性学生就处于多数,不过女性教授的比例却增长缓慢。而且,身居高级职位的女性更是少得可怜。

加拿大统计局的伊萨德(Lahouaria Yssaad)认为,女性教职员通常较年轻,她们从业时间较短,还没有来得及树立学术威望。虽然越来越多的女性获得博士学位,不过要熬到教授尚需时日。此外,和其他领域情况一致的是,不少女性放弃事业,转向家庭。

不过黛拉奇对此解释并不满意。她指出,男女教师在获得永久职位,或终身教职时,比例大约一致,但到评教授的时候,女性就少了很多。她认为关键是评审程序不公平。

统计还表明,女性学者大多集中于人文领域,而人文学者的薪酬要比商科、数学等男性教授占绝对多数的领域偏低。

20070129/安省修改日托津贴计划

星报通讯社电/安省政府修改日托津贴计划,使更多家庭可获政府补助。但儿童福利倡导人士警告,如果没有更多拨款,新的日托津贴计划不会有实质提高。

安省儿童及青少年服务厅长张珀丝(Mary Anne Chambers)今天宣布降低获得儿童日托津贴的门槛。

申请家庭过去需接受重重审查才能获取津贴,审查范围涉及家庭收入,资产,日常开销等。但从本月开始,津贴将以家庭收入为唯一标准。届时,更多中低收入的安省家庭可有资格获得日托津贴。

新津贴系统将免除收入2万元以下家庭的所有日托费。年收入2至7万的家庭则按比例支付托儿费。

儿童权益人士纷纷欢迎新的日托补助政策,然而同时担心计划若没有更多拨款支持,所有期望的好处都会落空,只会使更多人排队等待取得津贴。

多市官员认为,安省不会在 年新预算中为日托计划增加拨款。如果这样,多伦多担心新计划会导致1,500万元款项空缺。市议员米赫域(Joe Mihevc)认为,削减数千受补助的日托机会是唯一能弥补亏空的办法。

下一页 »